Skip to comments.
U.S.: Climate Change Climate Changing
OneWorld ^
| 11/21/06
| Haider Rizvi
Posted on 11/21/2006 6:09:56 AM PST by presidio9
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-92 next last
1
posted on
11/21/2006 6:09:57 AM PST
by
presidio9
To: presidio9
The only reasonable way we can significantly reduce emmissions is start building lots of nuclear plants.
To: presidio9
It has long been accepted that the Earth has experienced climate cycles, most notably the 90,000-year Ice Age cycles. But in the past 20 years or so, modern science has discovered evidence that within those broad Ice Age cycles, the Earth also experiences 1,500-year warming-cooling cycles. The Earth has been in the Modern Warming portion of the current cycle since about 1850, following a Little Ice Age from about 1300 to 1850. It appears likely that warming will continue for some time into the future, perhaps 200 years or more, regardless of human activity.The Physical Evidence of Earth's Unstoppable 1,500-Year Climate Cycle
3
posted on
11/21/2006 6:21:43 AM PST
by
E. Pluribus Unum
(Islam is a religion of peace, and Muslims reserve the right to kill anyone who says otherwise.)
To: presidio9
And Now, for the Traditional "Human Caused Global Warming" Slide
4
posted on
11/21/2006 6:22:32 AM PST
by
Paloma_55
(I may be a hateful bigot, but I still love you)
"The 1997 Kyoto treaty requires as many as 35 industrialized countries to cut emissions by an average of 5 percent below 1990 levels by 2012. The United States is not obligated to abide by the treaty because the George W. Bush administration does not recognize it.
The Bush administration rejected Kyoto in 2001 ..."
This is an outrageous distortion and a plain attempt to blame Bush. A principal reason the U.S. does not recognize Kyoto is because it was never ratified by the U.S. government under the CLINTON administration. Even Clinton understood that it would create an economic disater with no tangible benefit.
To: Zap Brannigan
That's a good idea. Bring Barbara boxer front and center. Nasty and dumb. She's a perfect person to immediately neutralize unwarranted popularity of dems.
6
posted on
11/21/2006 6:36:03 AM PST
by
ClaireSolt
(Have you have gotten mixed up in a mish-masher?)
To: presidio9
In Nairobi, while delegates failed to set a deadline ....they did agree to continue their discussions in the future. If they wait for 10 more years there is a pretty good chance that we'll be heading for a cooling period like the late 50s and 60s that was called a mini ice age.
7
posted on
11/21/2006 6:36:18 AM PST
by
BeAllYouCanBe
(Until Americans love their own children more than they love Nancy Pelosi this suicide will continue.)
To: presidio9
The Bush administration rejected Kyoto in 2001, The author is either ignorant or a lier. The president cannot approve treaties. The senate does that. And a sense of the senate vote in 1997, during the Clinton administration, rejected Kyoto 95-0.
8
posted on
11/21/2006 6:38:11 AM PST
by
BigBobber
To: Zap Brannigan
It was particularly the US Senate that voted not to ratify the treaty. The vote was overwhelmingly bipartisan, and overwhelming in numbers against ratification. I do beleive it was also a democratic controlled senate. Babs is completely insane if she thinks the American people are going to miss the giant flip flop.
9
posted on
11/21/2006 6:41:51 AM PST
by
wita
(truthspeaks@freerepublic.com)
To: presidio9
10
posted on
11/21/2006 7:04:55 AM PST
by
yldstrk
(My heros have always been cowboys-Reagan and Bush)
To: presidio9
"The recent elections have signaled a need to change direction in many areas including global warming,"
Typical over reach...All the wackos will say this for their own wacko agenda!
11
posted on
11/21/2006 7:45:14 AM PST
by
Edgerunner
(Better RED than DEAD)
To: Paloma_55
And Now, for the Traditional "Human Caused Global Warming" SlideFurther evidence that you have no idea what this means and why it is significant for the understanding of current, anthropogenically forced, climate change.
To: BeAllYouCanBe
If they wait for 10 more years there is a pretty good chance that we'll be heading for a cooling period like the late 50s and 60s that was called a mini ice age.The probability of this is lower than the probability of a continuation of the warming trend.
To: cogitator
Yup- the dems will be jumping on this huge cash cow called 'global warming'- I can see them now, all sitting around lickingtheir chops at the prospect of bilking billions from citizens and businesses over somethign that will have ZERO impact on a NATURALLY occuring phenomenom
Christian news and commentary at: sacredscoop.com ...
14
posted on
11/21/2006 9:34:40 AM PST
by
CottShop
(http://sacredscoop.com)
To: cogitator
Not all anthropogenically forced climate change is bad, is it?
15
posted on
11/21/2006 9:52:29 AM PST
by
Paloma_55
(I may be a hateful bigot, but I still love you)
To: cogitator
The UK government has already attempted to profit from global warming. The Stern Review, a UK government sanctioned report concerning global warming advocates what IBD reported as stealth taxes. The review itself is jam packed with "tax-driven solutions" from adding a tax mechanism to gas prices, taxing SUV owners, adding a "pay-per-mile pollution tax on motorists, a value-added tax on flights to EU destinations and a new tax on inefficient large appliances and light bulbs." Socialism has been resurrected through global warming.
To: presidio9
The United States is not obligated to abide by the treaty because the George W. Bush administration does not recognize it. Also, George W. Bush used his magical Rove-a-tron 2000 Time Machine to unseat Bill Clinton in 1996.
17
posted on
11/21/2006 10:23:52 AM PST
by
Sloth
(The GOP is to DemonRats in politics as Michael Jackson is to Jeffrey Dahmer in babysitting.)
To: Paloma_55
Not all anthropogenically forced climate change is bad, is it?Not all ice cream, candy, soft drinks, hamburgers, cheeseburgers, and french fries are bad, right?
To: CottShop
over somethign that will have ZERO impact on a NATURALLY occuring phenomenomThe current warming trend likely has a significant anthropogenic forcing component.
To: ML Capitalist
I think that the solution is technologically-driven, and should be motivated more from the energy sector (on the basis of economic and national security) than from the environmental sector.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-92 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson