Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CIA analysis finds NO IRANIAN NUCLEAR WEAPONS DRIVE: report (Another classified leak)
Yahoo ^ | 11/19/06

Posted on 11/19/2006 2:41:41 PM PST by Mr. Brightside

CIA analysis finds no Iranian nuclear weapons drive: report

Sat Nov 18, 11:18 PM ET

WASHINGTON (AFP) - A classifed draft CIA assessment has found no firm evidence of a secret drive by Iran to develop nuclear weapons, as alleged by the White House, a top US investigative reporter has said.

Seymour Hersh, writing in an article for the November 27 issue of the magazine The New Yorker released in advance, reported on whether the administration of Republican President George W. Bush was more, or less, inclined to attack Iran after Democrats won control of Congress last week.

A month before the November 7 legislative elections, Hersh wrote, Vice President Dick Cheney attended a national-security discussion that touched on the impact of Democratic victory in both chambers on Iran policy.

"If the Democrats won on November 7th, the vice president said, that victory would not stop the administration from pursuing a military option with Iran," Hersh wrote, citing a source familiar with the discussion.

Cheney said the White House would circumvent any legislative restrictions "and thus stop Congress from getting in its way," he said.

The Democratic victory unleashed a surge of calls for the Bush administration to begin direct talks with Iran.

But the administration's planning of a military option was made "far more complicated" in recent months by a highly classified draft assessment by the Central Intelligence Agency "challenging the White House's assumptions about how close Iran might be to building a nuclear bomb," he wrote.

"The CIA found no conclusive evidence, as yet, of a secret Iranian nuclear-weapons program running paallel to the civilian operations that Iran has declared to the International Atomic Energy Agency," Hersh wrote, adding the CIA had declined to comment on that story.

A current senior intelligence official confirmed the existence of the CIA analysis and said the White House had been hostile to it, he wrote.

Cheney and his aides had discounted the assessment, the official said.

"They're not looking for a smoking gun," the official was quoted as saying, referring to specific intelligence about Iranian nuclear planning.

"They're looking for the degree of comfort level they think they need to accomplish the mission."

The United States and other major powers believe Iran's uranium enrichment program is ultimately aimed at producing fissile material for nuclear weapons.

Iran insists it will use the enriched uranium only to fuel nuclear power stations, something it is permitted to do as a signatory to the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty.

The major powers have been debating a draft United Nations resolution drawn up by Britain, France and Germany that would impose limited sanctions on Iran's nuclear and ballistic missile sectors for Tehran's failure to comply with an earlier UN resolution on halting enrichment.

On Wednesday, Israel's outgoing US ambassador Danny Ayalon said in an interview that Bush would not hesitate to use force against Iran to halt its nuclear program if other options failed.

"US President George W. Bush will not hesitate to use force against Iran in order to halt its nuclear program," Ayalon told the Maariv daily.

Israel, widely considered the Middle East's sole if undeclared nuclear power, views Iran as its arch-foe, pointing to repeated calls by President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad to wipe the Jewish state off the map.


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: cialeak; compromised; doubleagent; espionage; geopolitics; iran; moles; proliferation; seymourhersh; sovietspy; whodeykiddn
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-104 last
To: Mr. Brightside
Israel doesn't care what the CIA leaker says, the are only concerned with what Mossad says and since Israel is gonna be the country that deals with Irans nuke thing, the leak is simply irrelevant to the events that will follow.

Of course the leaker should go to jail but that's another story.

101 posted on 11/20/2006 6:46:07 PM PST by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Brightside

I don't believe it! I don't believe it! I don't believe it!

It's NOT that I don't believe the story - it's the "leak".

What the H*ll is going on with the Federal Government?
It USED TO BE that revealing classified information resulted in being prosecuted/convicted/and locked up!

Can anyone say "treason"? Can anyone in government understand the phrase "giving aid and comfort to the enemy"!

It's high-time the government get tough, EXTREMELY TOUGH on what the liberals and MSM call "leaks".


102 posted on 11/20/2006 9:12:19 PM PST by GVNR ( Anti-AmericanLeftists run rampant in OUR OWN government, and should be arrested!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: txflake
Hi "txflake"!

"Cheney said the White House would circumvent any legislative restrictions 'and thus stop Congress from getting in its way,' he said"

This is exactly what it will take; the resolve of men and women like Vice President Cheney!

Nancee

103 posted on 11/26/2006 10:38:42 PM PST by Nancee ((Nancee Lynn Cheney))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: GVNR
I'm beginning to wonder if the CIA now receives the most sensitive intelligence collected by the NSA and the DIA, because the CIA can't be trusted to keep anything secret. That could explain why the White House, the Pentagon, our NATO allies, and Israel believe Iran is determined to build nuclear weapons while the CIA thinks otherwise. I'd like to hear what John Negroponte believes on this issue because he should have access to all the intelligence.

The key point that Hersh is missing is that we cannot allow Iran to develop the capability to build nuclear weapons even if we're not sure about their intent to actually build and use bombs. If Iran gains that capability then it becomes extremely risky to take action to stop them from building or using nuclear weapons because we would not be sure that they don't already have them. So capability is the key red line that we can't allow them to cross. Hersh needs to step away from his computer and take a long weekend just to think about this issue and the very real potential for a nuclear-armed Iran to launch a catastrophic attack on Israel, Europe, or America. I'm puzzled by the kind of simplistic, emotional thought processes going on inside Hersh's mind.

104 posted on 11/27/2006 12:09:53 PM PST by defenderSD (The concept of national martyrdom, combined with nuclear weapons, is extremely dangerous.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-104 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson