To: r9etb
Yes, in that the government had no other reason to search him except for the amount of cash (if it hadn't been for that doggie sniff)........
34 posted on
11/16/2006 6:55:55 AM PST by
Red Badger
(New! HeadOn Hemorrhoid Medication for Liberals!.........Apply directly to forehead.........)
To: Red Badger
And how are we certain of the scent of narcotics? Maybe the dude had Snausages in his bag.
37 posted on
11/16/2006 6:57:33 AM PST by
Lunatic Fringe
(Say "NO" to the Trans-Texas Corridor)
To: Red Badger
Yes, in that the government had no other reason to search him except for the amount of cash (if it hadn't been for that doggie sniff)........ IOW, you're suggesting that: if he hadn't given them several admissible-in-court clues, and the fellow hadn't lied to them, and the dogs hadn't sniffed illegal drugs on him, the cops wouldn't have had any probable cause....
42 posted on
11/16/2006 6:59:12 AM PST by
r9etb
To: Red Badger
It seems to me that when we fly we agree to endure the security procedures including searches. If you refuse to be searched, do not fly.
57 posted on
11/16/2006 7:12:04 AM PST by
mouske
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson