Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BlackbirdSST

Believe me we heard enough from stay-at-home
Repubs before the last election and guess what? We lost. Statistically more Dims than Repubs voted this time. That is unusual.

If the stay-at-homes want to have Hillary for president then keep it up.


199 posted on 11/15/2006 6:43:10 AM PST by BunnySlippers (Never Forget)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies ]


To: BunnySlippers
If the stay-at-homes want to have Hillary for president then keep it up.

Giuliani was perfectly happy to have Mrs. Clinton remain as his senator...

205 posted on 11/15/2006 6:44:42 AM PST by Sir Francis Dashwood (LET'S ROLL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 199 | View Replies ]

To: BunnySlippers

Do you have the numbers of the "stay-at-home" crowd. I keep reading about them as cause for this election but no data demonstrating that enough did in fact stay-at-home to have changed the results.

What I have read was the vast majority of the middle of the road, moderate, independent voters, voted for liberals. And the liberals had ballot initiatives in key states for raising the minimum wage which ensured the UNIONS got out their voters.


214 posted on 11/15/2006 6:49:40 AM PST by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 199 | View Replies ]

To: BunnySlippers
If the stay-at-homes want to have Hillary for president then keep it up.

Nope sorry. If the GOP wants to hand the WH to the hildebeast, by all means, keep it up. Blackbird.

246 posted on 11/15/2006 7:18:01 AM PST by BlackbirdSST (Stay out of the Bushes, unless you're RINO hunting!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 199 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson