Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Conyers says "No Impeachment" planned
FNC: The Big Story | 11/9/06 | John Gibson

Posted on 11/09/2006 2:51:41 PM PST by foreshadowed at waco

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 281-287 next last
To: sachem longrifle

It was funny and most of them knew we were mocking them. BTW, as you know, we have many more guns than they do.


201 posted on 11/09/2006 5:55:18 PM PST by unkus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 197 | View Replies]

To: foreshadowed at waco

They can't do an impeachment, the american people at large would hate it, and it would energize the republicans.

But by announcing ahead of time that they WON'T do it, they are acknowledging that all the stuff they've said the last six years was a lie, because if it was true Bush would DESERVE to be impeached.

Further, it enrages all those people who just gave them millions of dollars and thousands of hours of time making phone calls and walkng door to door, all in the belief that when the democrats won, they would impeach Bush, Cheney,and apparently the entire cabinet except for Norm Mineta.

Meanwhile, Pelosi is assuming she will be speaker of the house, but I don't know how she is positive all the new people will vote for her -- I guess it's a forgone conclusion, but it IS an election of the entire house, and it isn't a coronation. We were going to put Livingstone in the position and something came up and he dropped out, I suppose it could happen to her.

But assuming she is speaker, she's also apparently blocking all "hawk" democrats from having chairs, like Jane Harman (a sane democrat). This will certainly upset quite a few people with seniority, and should make independents think twice about democrat leadership.

It isn't easy running the country -- we saw the republicans botch it up pretty good the last couple of years, and I don't know if the democrats CAN do it worse but I have trouble imagining they will do it BETTER.


202 posted on 11/09/2006 6:14:29 PM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: foreshadowed at waco

Okay, everyone who believes a liar, raise your hand.


203 posted on 11/09/2006 6:18:42 PM PST by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: foreshadowed at waco
Oh yeah, I believe him......

Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting

204 posted on 11/09/2006 6:23:40 PM PST by b4its2late (FOOTBALL REFEREES: It's tough playing with us, but you can't play the game without us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Starboard
There is going to be lots of infighting and head-butting ahead within the party. It is going to be fun to watch this unfold...What I'm really looking forward to is when the big-money lefties get so pi$$ed at the 'rats that they start witholding some or all of their funding, or maybe even sending it to some looney left third party movement - that would really be fun.....
205 posted on 11/09/2006 6:40:51 PM PST by Intolerant in NJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 199 | View Replies]

To: Sir Gawain

There is way more enthusiasm for impeachment here than at DU.


206 posted on 11/09/2006 6:50:03 PM PST by drubyfive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ozoneliar
"Politically speaking, impeachment would be great for the GOP. It would help turn public opinion against the Dems Hillary."
207 posted on 11/09/2006 7:02:47 PM PST by sageb1 (This is the Final Crusade. There are only 2 sides. Pick one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: foreshadowed at waco

Just like Islam is a Religion of Peace


208 posted on 11/09/2006 7:04:06 PM PST by Tulsa Ramjet ("If not now, when?" "Because it's judgment that defeats us.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Intolerant in NJ

The radicals are already fuming over impeachment plans being shelved. They want revenge and they want it right now. They also are going to want to cut off funding for the war right now but that's probably not going to happen on their time table. Soros and MoveOn committed big resources and they are going to want a quick return on their investments in terms of activist legislation. Well, there's going to be some disappointment there because conservatives can stil delay and block legislation (just like the Dems did) but the radicals won't want to hear any excuses on why their pet legislation is not getting through. And so on. The point is the stage is getting set for some hand to hand combat within the party. The Dems are not going to be one big happy familiy. This brings to mind Will Rogers' famous quote: I don't belong to any organized party, I'm a Democrat.


209 posted on 11/09/2006 7:07:31 PM PST by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 205 | View Replies]

To: foreshadowed at waco
As a person who had some involvement in Clinton's impeachment, here are my impressions -

* Conyers is lying.

* Pelosi cannot be trusted.

* The hard-left faction of the Democratic Party is foaming at the mouth to get Bush impeached.

* A lot depends on whether the media play along.

210 posted on 11/09/2006 7:08:19 PM PST by HAL9000 (Get a Mac - The Ultimate FReeping Machine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: foreshadowed at waco

The Dems won't impeach the President. Look what impeachment did for the Republicans. Not a damn thing.


211 posted on 11/09/2006 7:08:28 PM PST by popdonnelly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aynrandfreak
"They will do investigations."

No. No. No. It's "oversight." To pave the way to find "common ground." /s

212 posted on 11/09/2006 7:14:43 PM PST by sageb1 (This is the Final Crusade. There are only 2 sides. Pick one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: null and void

I think the Repubs should put together a "Impeach Hillary January 2008" Oversight Committee.


213 posted on 11/09/2006 7:19:22 PM PST by sageb1 (This is the Final Crusade. There are only 2 sides. Pick one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: CFC__VRWC
"the public will be convinced that there is no single law that Bush didn't break."

They already think that. Why do you think we lost the election?

214 posted on 11/09/2006 7:21:03 PM PST by sageb1 (This is the Final Crusade. There are only 2 sides. Pick one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: BLS

It may be more dangerous if the DUmmies feel betrayed and that there's no chance of the 'Rats following through on impeachment...that serves in a way as a safety valve. Some of them could decide the only alternative left is a resort to violence. That character who tried to assault people at an Allen campaign event a few days before the election may not be the most extreme among the lot of them.


215 posted on 11/09/2006 7:34:36 PM PST by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: CarolinaGOP

Oh, they would go for impeachment of Cheney, too, so they could make Nancy Pelosi the President. (shudder)


216 posted on 11/09/2006 7:42:38 PM PST by Purrcival (We may be temporarily down, but we're NOT OUT! Not by a LONG shot!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque

They might not even want too many investigations, as the truth might find a way out. They just like to talk smack to their nutty base. What they will do is stop things like nominations/confirmations, no one will get a vote. Say goodbye to any judges or other appointments.


217 posted on 11/09/2006 7:47:28 PM PST by visualops (artlife.us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: foreshadowed at waco

Bull. Wait until they officially assume power.


218 posted on 11/09/2006 7:49:06 PM PST by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BLS
"They know that this was a phyrric victory." That had me going for a minute. One of those words you have a good idea of what it means, but you need to double-check the meaning of to be sure. The mis-spelling just about made me lose my mind (time for bed I guess)...

pyrrhic

adj 1: of or relating to a war dance of ancient Greece; "pyrrhic dance movements" 2: of or relating to or containing a metrical foot of two unstressed syllables; "pyrrhic verses" 3: of or relating to or resembling Pyrrhus or his exploits (especially his sustaining staggering losses in order to defeat the Romans); "a Pyrrhic victory" n 1: a metrical unit with unstressed-unstressed syllables [syn: dibrach] 2: an ancient Greek dance imitating the motions of warfare
219 posted on 11/09/2006 7:55:58 PM PST by jurroppi1 ("You can lead a man to Congress, but you can't make him think." - Milton Berle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Sir Gawain

[I bet those idiots at DU are pissed. LOL]

They'll wake up one day and realize they've been used. The majority of voters have to become more savy than the manipulative politicians and MSM.


220 posted on 11/09/2006 8:07:48 PM PST by khnyny (God Bless the Republic for which it stands)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 281-287 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson