Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rumsfeld resigns under pressure
The Washington Times ^ | November 9, 2006 | Rowan Scarborough

Posted on 11/09/2006 2:19:06 AM PST by John Carey

Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld, the icon of the U.S. war on Islamic terrorists, succumbed to mounting pressure to resign, allowing the Bush administration to begin examining a new course on the bogged-down Iraq war where the American death toll exceeds 2,800. Appearing with President Bush at the White House yesterday, Mr. Rumsfeld referred to his many critics on Iraq by paraphrasing a hero, Winston Churchill: "I have benefited greatly from criticism, and at no time have I suffered a lack thereof." He then talked of "this little understood, unfamiliar war," a conflict the Pentagon has dubbed "the long war" because of the time it will take to dismantle al Qaeda worldwide. "The first war of the 21st century is not well-known, it was not well-understood, it is complex for people to comprehend," he said. Mr. Bush, appearing the day after many Americans registered a protest vote against his Iraq policy, said, "As the secretary of defense, he has been dedicated to his mission, loyal to his president and devoted to the courageous men and women of our armed forces." He was flanked by his the defense secretary-designate, former CIA Director Robert M. Gates, who will take a fresh look at Iraq policy. White House press secretary Tony Snow told The Washington Times that Mr. Bush and Mr. Rumsfeld had been talking about future operations in Iraq for months, but he did not know who first raised the issue of the departure. "It wasn't like, 'come see the principal,' " Mr. Snow said, who noted Mr. Rumsfeld had offered twice to resign two years ago.

(Excerpt) Read more at washtimes.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-89 next last
To: chief911
Maybe I'm wrong, but why wait until the day AFTER the election to quit?

I agree. It looked as though he got "taken out to the woodshed." To me, to dismiss Rummy at this time, looked like the most humiliating way to be "thrown overboard."

61 posted on 11/09/2006 6:03:10 AM PST by A WASP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: A WASP
To me, to dismiss Rummy at this time, looked like the most humiliating way to be "thrown overboard."

What a load of BS

Rummy leaving has nothing to do with being "thrown overboard" and everything to do what is best for the country in a time of war

But these 2 men are not stupid .. they know what a Dem control Congress means

Non stop hearings of dragging Rummy up to Capital Hill for PUBLIC hearings if he remained in office

I will miss Rummy and I'm sad to see him go .. but the Dems will make his life and ours a living nightmare if he stayed

Something our country doesn't need in a time of war

Try thinking outside of the box

62 posted on 11/09/2006 6:08:05 AM PST by Mo1 (Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi is 2 heart beats away from the Presidency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: chief911
[I think this makes him look weak and not up for the fight]

Weak? For the love of God, he is 74 years old and already has been drawn and quartered by democrats and the press on a daily basis since he has been Secretary of Defense. He deserves to retire in peace and should be getting accolades from the nation, he has served.
63 posted on 11/09/2006 6:20:57 AM PST by RetSignman (MSMDEMS: "If you tell a big enough lie, frequently enough, it becomes the truth")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: buck61

Ditto's!


64 posted on 11/09/2006 6:30:02 AM PST by RetSignman (MSMDEMS: "If you tell a big enough lie, frequently enough, it becomes the truth")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Loud Mime

It is very clear to me why Rumsfield left when he did. He and Bush know what is in store for Rumsfield in 2007 when the Dems take control....endless hearings and second guessing. They also know that several Republicans(McCain among them) are no fan of Rumsfield. If they waited later when the Dems take power they can't get the votes for confirmation for the person they want. In addition, I bet Rumsfield had no desire to go through all the BS that lies ahead. It seems to me that this is an indication that Bush has no intention of "cut and run" but wants to spend time on conducting the war not not spend all the time in hearings. The decision on Rumsfield was made some time ago depending on the election results.


65 posted on 11/09/2006 7:17:42 AM PST by kydlm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: tonycavanagh
very funny very sarky, pity you got nothing real to say

Neither do you, at least I am Funny.

The Funny thing about all these armchair generals, they don't have to worry about the lives of the men under their command....

They don't have any.

66 posted on 11/09/2006 8:12:11 AM PST by usmcobra (I sing Karaoke the way it was meant to be sung, drunk, badly and in Japanese, that why I don't sing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: buck61; usmcobra; CDHart; Pan_Yans Wife; Steel Wolf
Thanks for all the replies sorry I cant reply back, but my time is limited this is only a short leave. And although I am smart I am only a Staff Sgnt so not important enough to dictate policy.

Sorry if I annoyed you all, I have no care for politics only political policy that dictates out I myself and my men are used.

Will post again in say two or three months. My reserve duty will be over in March and then I will once more be a regular on FR.

67 posted on 11/09/2006 8:24:33 AM PST by tonycavanagh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: tonycavanagh

Does that mean in three months you'll be able to tell us why Gates should resign?

I was just a lowly Sgt of Marines but even I know that no plan survives contact with the enemy. You roll with everything thrown at you until they stop throwing or you stop rolling.


68 posted on 11/09/2006 8:34:25 AM PST by usmcobra (I sing Karaoke the way it was meant to be sung, drunk, badly and in Japanese, that why I don't sing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: chief911
And from the SecDef himself:

"ALR: Political Jujitsu? I'm sorry Mr. Secretary but I don't follow you.

Rummy: Nobody saw this move coming yesterday. Nobody was prepared. It was a brilliant shifting of weight. Yesterday was supposed to be the Democrats big day. They were all going to wear new suits and dresses and give speeches congratulating themselves and talking about how they were going to fix the country. Instead all the news programs spent that time speaking about my resignation and today all the print media will be talking about me and my successor. The Democrats can't even complain because they have been practically begging for my resignation. By the time this dies down - nobody will want to look at their new suits or pretty dresses and they sure won't want to hear their flowery speeches because the time would have been well past that. The bonus is that the Main Stream Media doesn't even see how they were used. Brilliant move by the President."

Ah, and to think I lost faith there for a moment.

69 posted on 11/09/2006 8:46:36 AM PST by NonValueAdded (Prayers for our patriot brother, 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub. Brian, we're all pulling for you!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: NonValueAdded

Arrrrgh I've been had ... that piece was satire. That said, as good satire must haveo, there is a large grain of truth therein and the quote I pulled certainly rings true. It has that Rovian twist to it and it certainly was the outcome.


70 posted on 11/09/2006 8:56:43 AM PST by NonValueAdded (Prayers for our patriot brother, 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub. Brian, we're all pulling for you!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: tonycavanagh
Thanks for your service--

carolyn

71 posted on 11/09/2006 9:10:02 AM PST by CDHart ("It's too late to work within the system and too early to shoot the b@#$%^&s."--Claire Wolfe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: RetSignman
Let me try to qualify my statement. I know how hard he's fought over the last 6 years and God love him, I could not have done it. I also agree he deserves his retirement, but we both know he will never get any credit for anything from the MSM. What was it Reagan said, those on the other side of the aisle will never forgive us for our successes? Like I said, he was not under anymore pressure on Tuesday than he was 6 or 12 months ago. I just think that the timing sucked and it gave the Dems a win before their team even took the field. I did not mean it to be a slam on the man. Its really a problem with the way the administration handled the resignation overall. Even in retirement, the Dems will not let him rest and will still be calling him to the Hill when the hearings begin. Sorry if I gave the impression that I was insulting Rumsfeld.
72 posted on 11/09/2006 8:15:08 PM PST by chief911
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: tonycavanagh
Mainly, the MSM.
73 posted on 11/09/2006 8:17:28 PM PST by chief911
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: CheyennePress
Not to be rude, but it sure as heck looked like the leadership changed for political reasons anyway. Maybe this was a damned if you do or don't.
74 posted on 11/09/2006 8:18:59 PM PST by chief911
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Right_in_Virginia
Agreed. The larger problem here may be that no one on the political side of the administration saw that his resignation six months ago would have removed one of the biggest obstacles to the election the GOP had.
75 posted on 11/09/2006 8:21:27 PM PST by chief911
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: NonValueAdded
The hearings for Gates won't be any better. I am not saying appease the Dems, but at least use some of the so-called brillance of the Rove team to see that waiting until one day after the election just looks stupid. If he's been volunteering to go for a year, maybe it was time to accept it and move on.
76 posted on 11/09/2006 8:24:22 PM PST by chief911
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: mariabush
This is not your granddaddy's war.

You're right. Grandpa wouldn't have fought with politically correct considerations in mind. Fallujah would have been salt.

77 posted on 11/09/2006 8:34:48 PM PST by streetpreacher (Santorum 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: chief911

I may over reacted, emotions have been running high here on FR and, I for one, tend to get overheated when members start tearing apart our party. It destroys unity when we need it the most.


78 posted on 11/10/2006 5:38:40 AM PST by RetSignman (MSMDEMS: "If you tell a big enough lie, frequently enough, it becomes the truth")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: usmcobra
Got some PC time so thought I would check what you wrote and reply I am replying only to you because as a Military man even if what I say goes against your Political leanings you cannot deny my military logic.

Ok the roll with the punches thing my reply is grandmother and suck eggs like teach..

I am not sure if you grasp what my complaint with rummy is.

Here goes as a military man you will know all offensive actions break down into 5 phases. 1) Movement

2) Softening up

3) The Attack

4) Consolidation

5) Next phase

Whether you are taking a position or a country. Rumsfeld squashed all phase 4 planning. It being that we were to withdraw once Saddam was toppled the reason being that Iraq would welcome his demise and build a new democratic country.

This in my book was a major mistake. In any country yours or mine if you topple a system or a system breaks down as in Katrina you get a breakdown of law and order.

Iraq not the most stable country reacted the way intelligence predicted it would.

You also said no plan survives first contact with the enemy that is carved on my backside that is what contingency plans are for. Except we didn’t have a plan and we didn’t have a contingency plan.

We had a window of opportunity to put a phase 4 plan into action; I have had experience of phase 4 operations in both Bosnia Kosovo and Sierra Leone. One experience I have gained is work through the local police and Army units.

A major mistake was disarming all the Iraqi Army units many would have worked for us. Instead we disbanded them and many took there talents elsewhere.

Any civilians Phase 4 is

Pacification

Stabilisation

Normalisation

Will look in again next time i get PC time

79 posted on 12/08/2006 5:37:45 AM PST by tonycavanagh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Steel Wolf; Proud_texan; All
Because they were intimidated by guys in the State department? Are you serious? You think that Rumsfeld and Cheney went storming into the Oval Office, saying that if al-Sadr is allowed to live, and the Sunni insurgency isn't nipped in the bud, Iraq is doomed, but the State Department cowed President Bush into submission?

Wolf, your service to your country is greatly appreciated, and your posts usually offer some valuable insights, but here you are just being plain silly and naive.

At those pay-grade levels, no one is intimidated, no one goes storming into the Oval Office (at least since the days of Hillary), and President Bush was certainly not "cowed" into submission, by anyone. He was, however, seduced, enticed, or just simply persuaded (slice it however you wish, the result is the same) to give the Colin Powell/State Department/CIA faction control over the post-Battle of Baghdad/toppling Saddam phase of operations.

The Big Lie of these discussions is that Rumsfeld and the DOD have been in complete charge of the "rebuilding phase" when in fact it was Colin Powell and the State Department faction which "persuaded" the President to follow and implement their suggestions. It is a cruel irony that at the very moment in the Summer of 2003 when our miltary was achieving one of its greatest triumphs, they were losing the political battle in the White House to the faction which opposed their being in Iraq in the first place.

The DOD's designated man, General Jay Garner, was abruptly booted-out, and Paul Bremer, a creature of the State Department, took over and directed the policy in Iraq. He had the President' ear, and had veto power over the military. Bremer was the one who pulled the plug on the First Battle of Fallujah. Bremer was also the one who publicy declared that "Mookie" Sadr would be arrested and brought to justice for the murder of Ayatollah al Khoi, and then cravenly backed-down, doing wonders for our credibility.

The bottom line is that at the levels of power where these people operate, they rarely throw tantrums, make threats or go storming around - they DO understand the ways of power. One of those they understand is that the "Decider", whether he be President, King, Emperor, First Party Secretary, or Ali Baba at the head of his band of thieves, is always vulnerable or susceptible not only to the logical arguments, but also the whispers, flattery, blandishments or innuendo he hears from the "trusted advisors" with whom he surrounds himself. Some leaders in history have been better able to resist these influences than others, but all leaders face it, including President Bush, and they either choose wisely, or not.

80 posted on 12/08/2006 6:49:51 AM PST by tarheelswamprat (So what if I'm not rich? So what if I'm not one of the beautiful people? At least I'm not smart...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-89 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson