Skip to comments.
MSNBC/AP Bulletin: Rumsfeld Steps Down
MSNBC/AP
| 11.8.06
Posted on 11/08/2006 9:51:57 AM PST by mhking
This is just crossing my desk now; nothing follows yet. According to some sources this is the subject of the noon presser.
TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: buhbyerummy; freepersactinglikedu; lameduckprez; rumsfeld; yikes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 521-540, 541-560, 561-580, 581-591 next last
To: Route66
No military experience.
Wonder how the men and women in uniform feel about that?
541
posted on
11/08/2006 11:47:06 AM PST
by
Churchillspirit
(We are all foot soldiers in this War On Terror.)
To: redgolum
Rush is saying the next scalp they are hunting for is John Bolton.
542
posted on
11/08/2006 11:48:57 AM PST
by
sheikdetailfeather
(DEMOCRATS-POLITICIZING THE SAFETY OF AMERICA 24/7)
To: deep
Is it amazing how people still believe it's peaches and cream over there?
To: Doctor Raoul
Good point. This prevent the dems from dragging Rumsfeld in front of every committee over the next two years.
To: Coop
Hey Coop, how did that Irey thing turn out. I see we finally got a poll on that race.
545
posted on
11/08/2006 11:56:53 AM PST
by
saganite
(Billions and billions and billions-------and that's just the NASA budget!)
To: mhking
All I can say is good riddance.
I'm bound to be called a liberal or a commie, but sorry guys, I really don't think he has done a good job at all.
546
posted on
11/08/2006 12:01:02 PM PST
by
Blue Scourge
(C-17, anything, on time all the time.)
To: redgolum
He is a good choice. His foreign policy views are probably more similar to the people in Bush 41's administration, rather than the people Bush has had in his current administration.
To: TexKat
Gates' involvement in this could make his confirmation difficult.
548
posted on
11/08/2006 12:02:23 PM PST
by
Churchillspirit
(We are all foot soldiers in this War On Terror.)
To: mhking
549
posted on
11/08/2006 12:02:54 PM PST
by
Centurion2000
(If the Romans had nukes, Carthage would still be glowing.)
To: JohnnyBrown
I am however hopeful about Gates, hope he is confirmed without too much trouble....wishful thinking I know.
550
posted on
11/08/2006 12:04:09 PM PST
by
Blue Scourge
(C-17, anything, on time all the time.)
To: TomGuy
--His term of office began Novermber 8th, 2006 under President George W. Bush--
No it hasn't. He has to be confirmed by the Senate first.
551
posted on
11/08/2006 12:04:11 PM PST
by
ruffedgrouse
(Think outside the box, dammit!)
To: mhking
I am so darn upset about this I could just scream!!!
552
posted on
11/08/2006 12:04:40 PM PST
by
ladyinred
(RIP my precious Lamb Chop)
To: Mo1
Too far away to speculate about a Republican nominee.
Doubt it will be McCain.
553
posted on
11/08/2006 12:05:31 PM PST
by
Churchillspirit
(We are all foot soldiers in this War On Terror.)
To: CWOJackson
Call it what you want, but the polls agree, they would have voted for their party had Rummy done this earlier.
554
posted on
11/08/2006 12:10:05 PM PST
by
Texaggie79
(www.cannonblodder.com)
To: Texaggie79
LOL! It's everyone's fault...Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, the Bots...everyone's fault but those pouting little prisses who sat out the election or voted third party.
And I'm the King of Norway.
To: mhking
If Bush fired him, why did he wait until after the election?
556
posted on
11/08/2006 12:21:30 PM PST
by
FightThePower!
(Fight the powers that be!)
To: CWOJackson
Im not saying that it's right that they sat at home and did not vote, or that they voted the other way. I'm saying it seems pretty self evident that the results would have been different had Rummy resigned earlier, right or wrong. I'll take a win for the wrong reasons any day.
557
posted on
11/08/2006 12:21:30 PM PST
by
Texaggie79
(www.cannonblodder.com)
To: Texaggie79
The fact is, we're taking a loss for all the wrong reasons.
To: CWOJackson
I'm betting Tony Snow is next.....
Even he couldn't spin this election as twistedly as Bush just did...
To: Blue Scourge
I have mixed feelings about Rummy. When we went into Iraq, one of my concerns was the relatively small number of troops we used. The Army with a division was on the left and a Marine Division was on the right. Sure we beat the Iraqui Army, but we didn't overwhelm them. Then we disbanded what was left of the Iraqui Army instead of using them.
560
posted on
11/08/2006 12:25:48 PM PST
by
unkus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 521-540, 541-560, 561-580, 581-591 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson