Now, discounting the war casualties in Iraq (that IS a war after all), and not taking into account the attack on September 11, I'd say that the Bush years are free of attacks while the Clinton years were full of them, so we HAVE been safer these past six years than we were the previous thirteen.
P.S. I'm not even mentioning that USS Cole or attacks on Americans and/or American interests outside the US during the same period of time.
For every Danish tourist killed at the Empire State Building in 1997 there was a shooting at the El Al counter at LAX in 2002.
For every crash of an EgyptAir flight in 1999 there are two homosexual black men (a Muslim and an illegal immigrant a foreign invader) shooting people at random in the suburbs of Washington, D.C. in 2002.
And for every Jewish kid killed on the Brooklyn Bridge in 1994 there is an Iranian-born college student driving his car onto a crowded sidewalk on the campus of UNC Chapel Hill in 2006 while shouting "Allah Akbar!," "Osama is great!," "Rove, you magnificent bastard!" or something like that.
Oddly enough . . . the one thing just about all of these attacks (the ones you mentioned as well as mine) have in common is that the U.S. government -- under Democrat and Republican administrations alike -- has steadfastly refused to call them "acts of terrorism" under any circumstances.
Now you tell me just how effective this government has REALLY been in "fighting terrorism."