Posted on 11/02/2006 2:32:26 PM PST by Diana in Wisconsin
Jeepers; and I thought having a very left wing step-sister was tough to deal with. Your gay and 200# overweight sister make my problem sis seem trivial. I assume she is a leftie also.
Bless you, dealing with all that.
Then why are you going to a Catholic university?
Which is the gaystapo's stated goal: recruit for their cause from the young in society, whom they cannot beget themselves.
I believe, though, that once kids get away from the leftist school environment, they think better of what they've been told. Most reestablish themselves in the rational belief in natural affinities. I was once of a nonconformist mindset myself, more out of rebellion against the "system", but that all now looks silly to me in hindsight.
"OVERHAULING OF STRAIGHT AMERICA"
http://www.parentsrightsusa.com/Overhauling%20of%20Straight%20America.htm
BRAINWASHING 101 [THE PRO-GAY AGENDA] HAS BEEN EFFECTIVE IN OUR SCHOOLS AND THUS A WHOLE GENERATION HAS BEEN LED TO BELIEVE WE MUST ACCEPT THAT SAME SEX ATTRACTION BEHAVIOR IS AS NORMAL AS HETEROSEXUAL...SAD INDEED!
Hey, Diana. How are the winds blowing concerning the amendment in WI lately? Do you have any different feelings than a few months ago (closer, razor thin margin, doubtful?) Homogroups calling Wisconsin a possible victory, but I'm sure that's spin.
bookmark
There is a bill in the Massachusetts legislature that would force the homosexual agenda on all students.
For more information, google H1641 S102
And 100 lbs. of THAT is in unshaven body hair alone. *Ba-Dump-Dump*
Thank You! I'll be here all week. Try the buffet! ;)
"Homogroups calling Wisconsin a possible victory, but I'm sure that's spin."
The more they yap, the more I'm convinced that they're in their death throes. The pro-amendment crowd has been VERY civil about the whole thing, and continually states time and again that they want to protect the sanctity of marriage, not deny gays any rights.
However, there was a BIG dust-up today. The "homophobic" name calling started today by the head guy that is pro-gay and it will continue until Tuesday. (He's 'Pulling a Kerry,' claiming that his comments were just misunderstood. Yeah, right...)
Since anyone that wants to vote to protect traditional marriage has been painted into a corner and called every un-PC name in the book, I'm sure the phone polls are totally skewed. We Wisconsinites keep our card hands close to our vests and if someone called me on the phone to ask me how I'd vote, I'd tell them what they wanted to hear and then vote my faith and conscience.
I really hate like h#ll to mess with our State Constitution. I'm a tad Libertarian (without all the pot smoking and drunk driving arrests, LOL!) If the demanding, shrill, girly-man freaks hadn't of backed ANY of our States into a corner, this wouldn't be happening. I cannot belive New Jersey caved! But I don't blame the citizens; I blame Judges With An Agenda.
I believe that if you want to get "married" do it in your Church in the eyes and love of God. If you want to form a "civil union" of some sort, go see a lawyer. I see a clear difference where others sometimes don't. I'm not too crazy that the state demands I pay them a stipend to "recognize" my marriage in the form of a license, to tell you the truth.
And then that tax "benefit" of being married? Well, I can't tell you how much I've gained from THAT through the years, being married to a man who has an innate FEAR of money; if he has some, he needs to rid himself of it pronto, LOL!
Lots to weight and think about between now and Tuesday. I may surprise myself on this one, actually. *SHRUG*
The Vote no people are very pushy here. They are also controlled by the College Democrats.
Read tomorrow/pingout.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.