Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ElPatriota
This amendment could in the future deny same gender couples in committed relationships the protections and benefits available to married couples, such as access to spousal Social Security benefits upon a partner's death, automatic "next of kin" emergency medical decisions and "family member" hospital visitation rights.

Which begs the question: why should two unrelated males gain these rights simply because they engage in sexual acts? In orther words, why should these special "friends" have rights denied to two men who have been closer than brothers since childhood (a committed relationship) but have no sexual relationship? Do you assign some "sacred" significance to the sexual act?

26 posted on 11/02/2006 2:11:40 PM PST by RobbyS ( CHIRHO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: RobbyS
...Which begs the question: why should two unrelated males gain these rights simply because they engage in sexual acts? In other words, why should these special "friends" have rights denied to two men who have been closer than brothers since childhood (a committed relationship) but have no sexual relationship? Do you assign some "sacred" significance to the sexual act?...

Haaah... the problem with you sir, is that you are too smart. Or another way to put it, is that perhaps we red staters are not so stupid as our worldly, sophisticated friends pushing the homosexual agenda think we are!

You are absolutely right... just because two men* (or three or four)engage in perverse sexual acts... why in HELL is that reason to "grant them special rights!"...When did that happen????

Look let's cut to the chase... we all know homosexuals are educated and make very good money. That means they have the options and the brains to invest their money and have plenty for when they retire... just like MANY SINGLE MEN out there. So this is not about the protection of assets for the surviving "spouse" or anything like that. And if they do have something they want to share and protect, you can go to LAWYER and create a document.

This is about... advancing the HOMOSEXUAL AGENDA and to do that they have even gone as far as adopting children (a SIN) in order to attempt bamboozle us - the stupid ones - into thinking they are a family, rather than just a couple of perverts doing their thing, pure and simple :)

They are even trying the "soft" approach now, as I have seen it here if FR. Oh you know how it goes, not all homos are liberal, not all like the ridiculous gay pride parade. Or they fiscal conservative.. etc etc etc. But notice, that whatever they do, they MUST LET YOU KNOW THEY ARE HOMOSEXUALS!... Because if they did whatever in hell they wanted to do and keep it private... well... then, that would not advance the agenda.. etc...etc...etc.

You know how the whole argument goes

The thing is as I said it before somewhere, THE CAT IS OUT OF BAG...and now we are aware of what they are trying to do and we will fight them, because it is OUR DUTY to defend the sanctity of marriage for our kids

There... I said a lot and now I am tired :). Take care

38 posted on 11/02/2006 4:31:05 PM PST by ElPatriota (Let's not forget, we are all still friends despite our differences)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson