Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BeHoldAPaleHorse
It's rather preposterous to think that Ann Coulter would purposely do something illegal, and expect to stay under the radar. She is after all a very public person, and, due to her politics and very confident manner, a target.

In July, Anderson said, he received a letter from Coulter's attorney, Marcos Daniel Jimenez D'Clouet. The letter said the attorney would only discuss the matter in person or by telephone because, he complained, Anderson had given details to the media. Anderson said the matter had to be discussed in writing.

I think this a fair request. Does anyone seriously think if this was about Ann Jones that the case would be pursued with such vigor?? Lawyers negotiate. That's their job. Her lawyer is doing his job in trying to protect her.

I wonder how many dead people and felons will vote in FLA. Will Anderson pursue THAT "scandal"? I doubt it...

144 posted on 11/03/2006 5:54:42 AM PST by veronica (http://www.freerepublic.com/~starcmc/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies ]


To: veronica
One doesn't have to answer an attorney. I reemember getting a call from someone who wanted me to testify. My attorney said to "hang up" on him. If he really wants you, you'll get a subpeona.

There's no facts here as far as I can see...only speculation about Coulter. And the magic legal word is "knowingly". This was a Town Council election. Ann's vote was important??

145 posted on 11/03/2006 6:02:40 AM PST by Sacajaweau (God Bless Our Troops!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson