Posted on 11/02/2006 7:28:07 AM PST by presidio9
Dialogue with America's enemies, improved ties with other countries and more aggressive scrutiny of Bush administration decision-making are all high on the foreign policy agenda if Democrats score big in next week's U.S. elections.
ADVERTISEMENT
Under the U.S. Constitution, presidents have the lead on foreign policy and that will continue no matter which party controls Congress after November 7.
But if Democrats take the House of Representatives, and maybe the Senate, as some polls predict, they could influence international relations -- through committee chairmanships and budget authority -- in ways they have not since 2001, when President Bill Clinton left office.
Iraq is the focus. Democrats and a growing number of Republicans are alarmed at Bush's handling of the worsening war.
But Democratic divisions on what to do -- withdraw U.S. troops now, withdraw in some certain time frame, even beef up the military presence -- are well-documented. This sets the stage for robust debate after a high-level study panel recommends potential solutions before the new Congress takes office in January.
More broadly, Democrats likely to lead foreign policy committees hope to move beyond what they consider other Bush mistakes.
"I will work hard on fostering better relations, more respect for relations with both allies and non-allies," said U.S. Rep. Tom Lantos (news, bio, voting record) of California, who may lead the House International Relations Committee.
"There has been a distinct deterioration of U.S. relations with a very large number of countries" from France to Indonesia, he told Reuters.
DEMOCRATS' DIRECT APPROACH
Lantos and Sen. Joseph Biden (news, bio, voting record) of Delaware, who could become chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, favor direct U.S. talks, largely eschewed by Bush, as key to negotiated solutions with Iran and North Korea over their nuclear programs.
"America, whose greatest strengths are her ideas and her ideals, has become afraid to talk," Biden said in a speech on Tuesday, adding: "It's time to find our voice again."
But this approach does not mean problem countries will not be called to account. Biden plans to introduce legislation holding North Korea responsible if it transfers nuclear technology to a radical group that uses the weapon.
And Congress has shown bipartisan support for sanctions on Iran.
Senior Democratic aides, who said the administration often stonewalled Congress, predicted a Democratic majority would vigorously examine issues ranging from contracts for work in Iraq to U.S. policy in the Middle East.
The Homeland Security Department, created after the September 11 attacks, and the Millennium Challenge Account, which aids developing free-market democracies, are other likely targets.
But one prominent lobbyist said it wasn't clear how a Democratic majority would exert itself, especially if the Senate stays Republican and the House majority is narrow.
A Democratic Congress may pay more attention to the U.S. trade deficit with China and China's human rights record but is not expected to provoke any major shift in U.S. policy.
"The China consensus in this town remains strong in terms of favoring a high level of U.S. engagement across a broad front with China," said one senior Democratic aide.
If Democrats win the Senate, they could make trouble for Bush by thwarting confirmation of senior appointees, including U.N. Ambassador John Bolton, who having failed to win Senate approval, is serving under a provisional appointment.
The period between the election and inauguration of the new Congress could affect the landmark U.S.-India nuclear agreement, which passed the House but stalled in the Senate.
We will give Iran our nuclear submarine fleet, if they just sign this piece of paper saying they will be nice to us.
I would think that NORAD and the Commander In Chief will "hold North Korea reponsible" with something more potent than Congressional legislation.
As potent as the Democrats' response to Kenya, the '83 WTC bombing, the USS Cole, Somolia, or the Khobar Towers?
...and dont they have a 'secret strategy' to the war in Iraq? lol
----
They could care less about the Iraq war, and the war on terror. They want those dollars for socialist power and control which is really all they are interested in. More 9/11s? No problem -- they will just wave the white flag and NEGOTIATE with our enemies until we are all bowing to Mecca.
Socialist moron power freaks.
Translation: "We'll do whatever the enemy demands!"
This is the issue! The pleading for our enemies to please not kill us, becoming friends with terrorists is a recipe for our destruction. That is all the Demonrats offer. And the GOP needs to make this the issue with the remaining week before the election. They are a danger to our security.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.