Skip to comments.
Govt. Tells Singles No Sex Till You're 30
ABSNews Health ^
| 10/31/06
| Brian Hartman
Posted on 11/01/2006 10:48:21 AM PST by steve-b
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200, 201-220, 221-240, 241-252 last
To: Pondman88
So the govt is promoting a healthy lifestyle--is that a bad thing??? It depends on the meaning of the word "healthy".... to you.
Your judgment of whether a policy is good or bad makes the difference.
Look at China's one-child policy. It intrudes on people's freedom while proclaiming to be "for the common good".
What do you think? Society or the individual decides?
To: LurkedLongEnough
I got no problemo with govt promoting no sex before marriage. it's smart and healthy and something I wish i had done.
And promoting no sex is vastly different from promoting one child and abortion.
Anyhoo--goodnight and Vote Tuesday--Let's kick some liberal ass!!!
To: TWfromTEXAS
243
posted on
11/05/2006 5:06:31 PM PST
by
mad_as_he$$
(Never corner anything meaner than you. NSDQ)
To: mad_as_he$$
244
posted on
11/05/2006 5:07:28 PM PST
by
humblegunner
(If you're gonna die, die with your boots on.)
To: humblegunner
Well when I picked that name FR was a kinder gentler place and any questionable words (2001)were policed by the word police. So he$$ is hell.
245
posted on
11/05/2006 5:10:23 PM PST
by
mad_as_he$$
(Never corner anything meaner than you. NSDQ)
To: mad_as_he$$
Well when I picked that name FR was a kinder gentler place Oh, OK.
I was thinking it might have to do with Hess, the nazi.
Now I see it is indicative of playground spelling of "bad words".
246
posted on
11/05/2006 5:18:01 PM PST
by
humblegunner
(If you're gonna die, die with your boots on.)
To: humblegunner
Not a bad guess! Hess was 'mad' but in a different way! I'm just usually pissed off! (mostly a politicians and bureaucrats!)
247
posted on
11/05/2006 5:21:39 PM PST
by
mad_as_he$$
(Never corner anything meaner than you. NSDQ)
To: LibertarianInExile
Touche...
But then I never said that they were faultless. Our job as libertarians is to convince them that they are wrong in these instances.
To: Brilliant
Why? That is not the decision of you or the government. What is this a chapter out of George Orwell's 1984?
To: RedStateRocker
If the DNC ever gets the heavy hand again the anti-sex league will be in full power. Party members will be exempt.
250
posted on
11/06/2006 12:05:29 AM PST
by
oyez
(Why is it that egalitarians act like royalty?)
To: steve-b
the federal government wants you to steer clear of sex.So do most single women I meet...
251
posted on
11/06/2006 12:09:07 AM PST
by
GOP_Raider
(FReepmail me if you would be interested in creating a FR College Hoops Ping Lists.)
To: lndrvr1972
Who said it was a decision for me or for the government? I just said they shouldn't be doing it.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200, 201-220, 221-240, 241-252 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson