Posted on 11/01/2006 6:13:24 AM PST by Uncledave
Kerryism [Victor Davis Hanson]
Kerry surely must be one of the saddest Democratic liabilities around. Some afterthoughts about his latest gaffe, which is one of those rare glimpses into an entire troubled ideology:
(1) How could John Kerry, born into privilege, and then marrying and divorcing and marrying out of and back into greater inherited wealth, lecture anyone at a city college about the ingredients for success in America? If he were to give personal advice about making it, it would have to be to marry rich women. Nothing he has accomplished as a senator or candidate reveals either much natural intelligence or singular education. Today, Democrats must be wondering why they have embraced an overrated empty suit, and ostracized a real talent like Joe Lieberman.
(2) How could Kerry possibly claim that he was thinking of the uneducated in the context of George Bush, who, after all, went to Harvard and Yale?
(3) Some of the brightest and most educated Americans are not only in the military, but veterans of Iraq. Two of the best educated minds I have met-Col. Bill Hix and Lt. Col. Chris Gibson, both Hoover Security Fellows-were both Iraqi veterans. What is striking about visiting Iraq is the wealth of talent there, from privates to generals. Without being gratuitously cruel, the problem of mediocrity is not in the ranks of the military, but on our university campuses, where half-educated professors and non-serious students killing time are ubiquitous. Personally, I'd wager the intelligence of a Marine Corps private any day over the average D.C. journalist. Every naval officer I met at the USNA, without exception, seemed brighter than John Kerry, whose "brilliance", after all, has managed to offend millions of voters on the eve of a pivotal election. If the Democrats lose, it will be almost painful to watch the recriminations against Kerry fly.
(4) This is not the first, but third, time he has denigrated soldiers in the middle of a war-and there is a systematic theme: John Kerry's assumed superior morality allows him to pass judgment from on high about supposedly lesser folk who become tools of a suspect military: thus we go from limb-loppers and Genghis' hordes to terrorists to dead-beats. The only constant is that the haughtiness is always delivered in the same sanctimonious, self-righteous, and patronizing tone.
(5) The mea culpa that Democrats are blaming the war and not the warriors is laughable after Sens. Durbin, Kennedy, and Kerry have collectively compared American soldiers to Nazis, Pol Pot's killers, Stalinists, terrorists, and Baathists.
(6) The problem is that Kerry is not just a senator, but the most recent presidential candidate of the Democratic Party, and thus in some sense, especially given the diminution of Howard Dean, the megaphone of the entire party.
(7) His pathetic clarification, as he blamed everyone from Tony Snow to Rush Limbaugh, displayed the same Al Gore derangement syndrome, and thus raises a larger question: what is it about George Bush that seems to reduce once sober and experienced liberal pros to infantile ranting?
(8) And why is the supposedly lame Bush so careful in speech, and the self-acclaimed geniuses like a Ted Kennedy, John Kerry, or Howard Dean serially spouting ever more stupidities? For all the Democrats' criticism of George Bush, I can't think of a modern President who has so infrequently put his foot in his public mouth, and, by the same token, can't think of any opposition that on the eve of elections seems to have an almost pathological death wish.
The Democrats should use this occasion to have an autopsy of Kerryism, or this strange new tony liberalism, that has turned noblisse oblige on its head. It used to be that millionaire FDRs and JFKs felt sympathy for those of the lower classes and wished to ensure that the hoi polloi had some shot at the American dream. But today's elite liberals-a Howard Dean, Al Gore, Ted Kennedy, George Soros, Ted Turner-love the high life and playact at being leftists simply because they are already insulated from the effects of their own nostrums that always come at someone poorer's expense while providing them some sort of psychological relief from guilt. Poor Harry Truman must be turning over in his grave-from bourbon, cigars, and poker to wind-surfing and L.L. Bean costume of the day says it all. Posted at 8:35 AM
:-)
ROFL!
VERY GOOD POINT! Didn't someone fake another SECNAV's name on the paperwork? However, it was more likely done during the Carter administration, I think.
Or a person could call and ask for their Senator. Ask them to comment on what Kerry said.
What is a paper?
Doesn't matter to them. They still think Yale and Harvard should have turned him into one of them, or a copy of his dad at 'worst' (from their POV).
Thanks for the ping.
LOL
Very insightful post. I particularly agree with the above sentence. The President's unscripted sincerity and integrity is unmistakable.
He DID go to Iraq at some point. A friend (a blackhawk pilot) who returned last year from a year's tour told of how his group was in charge of ferrying Kerry around and how they absolutely loathed every minute of it. He said they were treated like his "house boys" and made to wait on him. He was disliked prior to his visit, and his haughty demeanor and attitude only served confirm their perceptions.
Kerry has no interest in seeing what these men and women are doing, or what they are all about. His only concern is his next photo op, and self promotion.
Easy. He's a conservative who talks with a southern drawl. It's a visceral reaction from liberals. They LOVE a southern liberal--"Look, we educated one of those southern apes, and now he agrees with us!". They look at a Bill Clinton or Jimmy Carter and laugh at how they fooled the yokels into voting for him just because he has a drawl and comes from south of the Mason-Dixon line. They know he is one of "them", and if that's what it takes to get the White House, they are ok with it.
But, tell them that their President, leader of the executive branch and commander in chief of the military is a southerner who talks like a Southerner, and thinks like most southerners do (i.e., is genuinely religious, patriotic and likes to follow the law as written), that makes them feel like the civil war is still on and they are losing. They will not accept being governed by the south and its mores. It's that simple.
Reagan, from Illinois and California, of midwestern and Irish stock, did not evoke the visceral hatred. They liked him in their hearts, even as they hated his wins over them and denigrated his policies.
It's primeval. It's subconscious. It's there for 2 more years. I say we send another southernor to the White House in '08, just to drive them even battier.
You are right, but he moved to Texas as a youngster. His dad was in the oil business, made money in the 40's and '50s, and had enough roots there to be a Texas congressman beginning in the '60s. Bush has always come across to me as a Texan with a bit of Yankee still in him.
Couldn't happen to a nicer bunch of people, could it?
"It's that he looks completely unnatural making the entire image(be it football, windsurfing, snowboarding) look completely fabricated for a photo-op"
My interpretation is that he has the time (after 20 years in the Senate) to learn rather complex sports such as windsurfing, sailing, mountain biking, snowboarding, and the rest.
He is what you might call "a man of leisure."
Standing ovation for Mr. Hanson! Thanks for posting this, Uncledave. BTTT!
BRAVO!! Wow, this is excellent!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.