Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: supercat
>> If the vote for everyone else is 50R-49D, the Republicans will win regardless of what Lieberman does; if it's 49R-50D, the R's will lose unless Lieberman votes for them. <<

The only way we'd end up with a 49-50-1 makeup is if Lamont somehow has a last minute surge in CT or hell freezes over and Sanders loses in VT.

Otherwise there will be two "independants" when the Senate conviences in 2007 (Lieberman, I-CT; Sanders I-VT), both of whom support the liberal position 90% of the time and have pledged to support Reid for majority leader.

In a 49-49-2 scenario, Lieberman casts the deciding vote to hand the Senate to Reid.

47 posted on 10/29/2006 8:27:33 PM PST by BillyBoy (ILLINOIS ELECTION "CHOICES:" Rod Bag-o-$hit or Judas Barf Too-Pinka)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]


To: BillyBoy
In a 49-49-2 scenario, Lieberman casts the deciding vote to hand the Senate to Reid.

He could just as well abstain with the exact same effect.

48 posted on 10/29/2006 9:34:36 PM PST by supercat (Sony delenda est.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson