That was an analogy of your flawed reasoning.
If I'm a Marxist tool for supporting science they try to use for their own purpose, then you are for saying what you did that echoed those leftists.
In other words, I don't think either of us are Marxist tools.
Republicans who embrace ID as science and demand it's taught as science when there is no scientific study behind it -- even the Templeton Foundation was willing to fund the research, Jim! There were NO TAKERS! -- WILL lose elections. I don't want that to happen. I don't want Republicans to attempt to politicize objective science for votes.
I'm still voting "R" because I agree with limited government, constructivist judges, the pro-life cause and the second amendment.
But science should be left alone. The only way to drive out bad science is good science, and when anti-evolutionists start doing science instead of apologetics, they will have my attention.
That's odd, I thought you would feel the opposite way about it.
No joke nor flame--but why trash apologetics for "not being science" when it isn't even *pretending* to be science?
I would be more concerned about ID masquerading as "real science" when it is just a mishmash of poor science and poor apologetics.
Cheers!
So, so true. Good science will push out bad.