Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Jim Robinson

That was an analogy of your flawed reasoning.

If I'm a Marxist tool for supporting science they try to use for their own purpose, then you are for saying what you did that echoed those leftists.

In other words, I don't think either of us are Marxist tools.

Republicans who embrace ID as science and demand it's taught as science when there is no scientific study behind it -- even the Templeton Foundation was willing to fund the research, Jim! There were NO TAKERS! -- WILL lose elections. I don't want that to happen. I don't want Republicans to attempt to politicize objective science for votes.

I'm still voting "R" because I agree with limited government, constructivist judges, the pro-life cause and the second amendment.
But science should be left alone. The only way to drive out bad science is good science, and when anti-evolutionists start doing science instead of apologetics, they will have my attention.


821 posted on 10/26/2006 10:03:17 PM PDT by stands2reason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 770 | View Replies ]


To: stands2reason
No, I think you're missing my point. I'll try again. I say the evolutionists on FR (and elsewhere) who are using their science as a weapon to insult and beat up on religious conservatives are being used as political tools by the Marxists. And the Marxist goals for this effort is to further split the conservative movement, help them eliminate any mention of God from our public life, and make it that much easier for them to destroy the rest of our God-given rights. Bringing forth a socialist Utopia is their ultimate goal (IMHO).

And it appears to working out for them. Too bad and too sad.
856 posted on 10/26/2006 10:25:38 PM PDT by Jim Robinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 821 | View Replies ]

To: stands2reason
The only way to drive out bad science is good science, and when anti-evolutionists start doing science instead of apologetics, they will have my attention.

That's odd, I thought you would feel the opposite way about it.

No joke nor flame--but why trash apologetics for "not being science" when it isn't even *pretending* to be science?

I would be more concerned about ID masquerading as "real science" when it is just a mishmash of poor science and poor apologetics.

Cheers!

862 posted on 10/26/2006 10:29:13 PM PDT by grey_whiskers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 821 | View Replies ]

To: stands2reason

So, so true. Good science will push out bad.


994 posted on 10/27/2006 5:55:21 AM PDT by satchmodog9 (Most people stand on the tracks and never even hear the train coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 821 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson