Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dominic Harr
"It doesn't have to be an 'us v. them' kind of thing."

Yes it does. If you are a "social liberal" you aren't Conservative, you're a liberal. You don't need to be "born again" to understand that murdering babies in the womb is wrong.

82 posted on 10/25/2006 1:46:48 PM PDT by Godebert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: Godebert
If you are a "social liberal" you aren't Conservative, you're a liberal.

Hi:

Well, as I said, I'm a social liberal, political conservative.

I'm 'live and let live' until it directly affects another person. If you can show me something directly affects another, I flip from liberal to conservative. For exampl, I can see the arguement for making abortions illegal. I believe it's a human being from first conception.

But I'm not Christian. I'm pro-gay marriage. And, I'm pro-legalizing soft drugs like pot. Not everything, not hard drugs. I'd be happy to discuss that in some other thread, some other time.

To me, this is all about politics. I don't really see much purpose in debating social issues like is pot use good or bad. I *do* like to debate if the govt should ban the substance. As a 'personal responsibility' question. That's just me, that's how I roll.

Like my tag line, I'm a 'political' conservative. the 'ant' to a political liberal's 'grasshopper'. 'Conservative', as in conservative estimates. I mean 'careful'.

Flame away!

96 posted on 10/25/2006 2:00:53 PM PDT by Dominic Harr (Conservative: The "ant", to a liberal's "grasshopper".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson