Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Coyoteman

I am familiar with both the literature on radiocarbon dating and with the creationist websites' distortions of that literature.



NO you misunderstood. I asked you if there were serious self inquiry in your field permitted...within the field...not from external sources.


372 posted on 10/25/2006 9:51:08 PM PDT by eleni121 ("Show me just what Mohammed brought:: evil and inhumanity")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 366 | View Replies ]


To: eleni121
NO you misunderstood. I asked you if there were serious self inquiry in your field permitted...within the field...not from external sources.

Of course. DeVries (1958), for example, made a major contribution to the calibration of samples. There has been a correction to the calibration curve within the last couple of years. It changed most of my samples by less than 5 years.

But the deliberations within the field are much different from those coming from the outside.

382 posted on 10/25/2006 9:54:40 PM PDT by Coyoteman (I love the sound of beta decay in the morning!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 372 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson