I am familiar with both the literature on radiocarbon dating and with the creationist websites' distortions of that literature.
Of course. DeVries (1958), for example, made a major contribution to the calibration of samples. There has been a correction to the calibration curve within the last couple of years. It changed most of my samples by less than 5 years.
But the deliberations within the field are much different from those coming from the outside.