[Dimensio]

Thats what the ACLU and the Godless liberal left said too.

This has little if an relevance to my previous statement.

But I can see your well reasoned point that there is no political bias./ sarc.

If you believe that "political bias" exists, then please explain how Intelligent Design qualifies as science, and explain what you believe is political bias regarding the issue.

[Beagle8U]

"If you believe that "political bias" exists, then please explain how Intelligent Design qualifies as science, and explain what you believe is political bias regarding the issue."

If evo is such an exacting science you could prove your theory in a classroom experiment by causing something to evolve into something entirely different. I'll wait patiently for the results of your proof.

If there was no political bias against ID you wouldn't have to team up with the leftwing demonrats to prevent it from being taught in schools.

[grey_whiskers]

If you believe that "political bias" exists, then please explain how Intelligent Design qualifies as science, and explain what you believe is political bias regarding the issue.

Trivial. The ACLU-types who *do* take sides on this, reject ID in science classes not because it is off-topic for a science class, but on the grounds of the mythological separation of church and state. Not from the "scientifically rigorous" grounds given by evo posters here on FR...

Cheers!