To: Dimensio
""Intelligent Design" does not qualify as science, and as such it is not appropriate to teach it as a "companion" to the theory of evolution."
Thats what the ACLU and the Godless liberal left said too.
But I can see your well reasoned point that there is no political bias./ sarc.
315 posted on
10/25/2006 9:21:59 PM PDT by
Beagle8U
(Demonrats want the Gays out of Congress.....stand back and let them purge their base.)
To: Beagle8U
Thats what the ACLU and the Godless liberal left said too.
This has little if an relevance to my previous statement.
But I can see your well reasoned point that there is no political bias./ sarc.
If you believe that "political bias" exists, then please explain how Intelligent Design qualifies as science, and explain what you believe is political bias regarding the issue.
319 posted on
10/25/2006 9:23:52 PM PDT by
Dimensio
(http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
To: Beagle8U
Thats what the ACLU and the Godless liberal left said too. Actually, it was a Dubya-appointed judge, but don't let the facts get in the way of a good rant.
327 posted on
10/25/2006 9:28:20 PM PDT by
wyattearp
(Study! Study! Study! Or BONK, BONK, on the head!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson