No, thanks.
What say gridlock on mutilating infants? Disfiguring children?
Enjoying this game? Go on, answer...
Well, I'm against those things, of course. But I wasn't the one who was bringing up destroying children, or pre-children, or whatever you want to call them. Since you are going to make a statement that the ownership of the whatever-they-are is important, I was just trying to see if that distiction extended to one's own born children, farther down the line.
I am heartened to see that apparently you see that at least some children deserve to be protected. Apparently there is some line that has to be crossed, in your view.