[Mamzelle]

You seek no "agreement"--this list is an attempt to set the terms of debate to your liking. Spam shouldn't be disputed, or even read. It should be ignored.

The first thing you do with a a control freak is to refuse to let him control anything. This relentless spamming is the behavior of a controlling personality--post something thousands of times, maybe someone will even care? The Voice Spamming in the Wilderness. Isn't that what you have your own forum for?

Not only would it be foolish to accept The List From Nowhere, it's foolish to even take it seriously enough to read, much less dispute. It's just endless spam from obsessives from another forum.

[Boxen]

"Spam shouldn't be disputed, or even read. It should be ignored."

A wonderful idea. I propose that we start ignoring Mamzelle immediately. In the meantime, here's a joke:

What's that difference between the New York Times and Mamzelle's posts?

Answer: At least I can wipe my ass with the New York Times.

[Coyoteman]

Not only would it be foolish to accept The List From Nowhere, it's foolish to even take it seriously enough to read, much less dispute.

Its not a "List from Nowhere:" it was developed in large part from this thread.

You can go back and read the thread and see how the terms were discussed and improved. You can even contribute your preferred definitions on that thread for discussion and possible inclusion in the definitions list.

Or you can just be a scold.