To: PeterPrinciple
The main plot line is that the nation was broke, and would have to sue for peace with the Japanese. I've read a lot of military hiostory and I've NEVER come across that BS.
13 posted on
10/20/2006 7:35:42 PM PDT by
Doctor Raoul
(New York Times? Get a rope!)
To: Doctor Raoul
I've read a lot of military history and I've NEVER come across that BS.That's because, of course, it ain't so.
14 posted on
10/20/2006 7:36:20 PM PDT by
Petronski
(CNN is an insidiously treasonous, enemy propaganda organ.)
To: Doctor Raoul
As a graduate student focusing on WWII, I can say I've never heard that either.
That part of the movie doesn't pass the smell test.
17 posted on
10/20/2006 7:38:18 PM PDT by
COEXERJ145
(Free Republic is Currently Suffering a Pandemic of “Bush Derangement Syndrome.”)
To: Doctor Raoul
I'm in agreement with you. No mention of even thinking of suing for peace. While the Marines were clearing the island, which the Japanese spent decades fortifying, the U.S. was preparing for a full thrust in the Pacific, once Germany was defeated, bolstered by the progress with the A Bomb. Iwo Jima, still under arguments, was required to gain a base from which to strike Japan and to give disabled planes a place to land. The thought of inserting the issue of suing for peace seems to me to be nothing more than a Hollywood stunt.
20 posted on
10/20/2006 7:47:49 PM PDT by
Seniram US
(Quote of the Day: Smile You're An American)
To: Doctor Raoul
Me either. I sat up in my chair. I seem to recall one line where the guy said that if the flag-raisers didn't get $16 billion with the next bond drive that the Marines and GIs would literally "run out of ammo."
82 posted on
10/21/2006 7:02:52 AM PDT by
LS
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson