Hubba Hubba! The 9th Circus Court of Schmiels is struck down again!!
1 posted on
10/20/2006 2:09:24 PM PDT by
Babu
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-79 last
To: Babu
Great news. Now how about Illinois, Michigan, Kalifornia, New Yawk, Ohio and other major fraudulent voter states.
136 posted on
10/20/2006 8:28:14 PM PDT by
Rembrandt
(We would have won Viet Nam w/o Dim interference.)
To: Babu
137 posted on
10/20/2006 8:28:41 PM PDT by
Enterprise
(Let's not enforce laws that are already on the books, let's just write new laws we won't enforce.)
To: Babu
Nancy might not be Speaker after all. Just dang.
139 posted on
10/20/2006 8:30:10 PM PDT by
EDINVA
To: Babu
I sure hope this catches on in other states.
141 posted on
10/20/2006 8:31:01 PM PDT by
Salvation
(†With God all things are possible.†)
To: Babu
How will citizens who are old or of nonEuropean extraction be disenfranchised? The rules are the same for all people. (rhetorical question).
147 posted on
10/20/2006 9:17:23 PM PDT by
Jedi Master Pikachu
( The BBC HYS is cruddy: many typed comments and not one posted (non-offensive).)
To: Babu
151 posted on
10/20/2006 9:36:57 PM PDT by
TheDon
(Angry at the Republican Party = Democrat Tool)
To: Babu
The Supreme Court ruled Friday that Arizona may require voters to provide photo IDs when they cast their ballots next month.The horror, the horror of it all...
152 posted on
10/20/2006 10:09:25 PM PDT by
Doofer
To: Babu
I think I'll send Randy Graf another contribution to celebrate.
To: Babu
Opponents of the law contend it discourages some people from voting, including the elderly, poor and disadvantaged who don't always carry IDs
These are the same people who have no problem producing ID when they go to the corner for a "32" and a lottery ticket..
170 posted on
10/21/2006 10:33:33 AM PDT by
GeorgiaDawg32
(At 53, I'm the life of every party I go to, even if it lasts till 8 p.m...)
To: Babu
Why is this even debated? It should be the law. Voting without ID? I need proper ID to get into my office builing everday, yet you can vote witout it? Insane. The only people that could be against it are the ones who want to vote multiple times ... there is no other reason.
To: Babu
AZ Prop 200 passed in 2004. All these supposedly "disenfranchised" people have now had almost two steenking YEARS to come up with voter I.D. If they can't get their act together in two steenking YEARS, they didn't want to vote very badly, did they.
Smiling Janet Nappy have been virtually quiet about this decision. I suspect she has polling that shows that AZ voters are fed up with fraudulent voting. Either that, or she has a plan brewing to block this decision in the next two weeks.
173 posted on
10/21/2006 11:43:12 AM PDT by
FlyVet
To: Babu
I'd like to see a class action brought on behalf of Stupid People, using democrats as examples, alleging stupidity in countless ways disenfranchised them. Good thing it does, of course.
175 posted on
10/21/2006 11:52:13 AM PDT by
Tax Government
(Defeat Islamic imperialists, democrats and...)
To: Babu
Anyone who is against this type of legislation is interested in committing vote fraud.
195 posted on
10/21/2006 9:28:38 PM PDT by
Rockitz
(This isn't rocket science- Follow the money and you'll find the truth.)
To: Babu
Anyone who is against this type of legislation is interested in committing vote fraud.
196 posted on
10/21/2006 9:28:41 PM PDT by
Rockitz
(This isn't rocket science- Follow the money and you'll find the truth.)
To: Babu
"Hubba Hubba! The 9th Circus Court of Schmiels is struck down again!!"
A great day for AZ. I am going to enjoy reading the Phoenix sunday paper in the morning to catch the whinings from the various anti ID groups/people.
197 posted on
10/22/2006 1:27:43 AM PDT by
Bogtrotter52
(Reading DU daily so you won't hafta)
To: Babu
I can't buy a battery at COSTCO without my drivers license, but you can vote without one...
Thank you SCOTUS! Next stop: crazy California, please!!
198 posted on
10/22/2006 2:54:42 AM PDT by
Barney59
("Another day on the planet")
To: Babu
Without the ninth circuit the Supreme court wouldn't have nothing to do!
205 posted on
10/22/2006 2:20:49 PM PDT by
ustanker
(Vote on the 7th)
To: Babu
"Voters w/o proper id can cast provisional ballots....."I believe i heard this discussed on Fox.Isn't there also a provision that provides free id's for individuals who wish to vote but don't have the necessary id?Furthermore,those furnishing the id's will go to the persons home and make it(id)on the spot?Is my understanding correct?How can it be any easier than that?Geeez.
208 posted on
10/23/2006 7:59:24 AM PDT by
Thombo2
To: Babu
215 posted on
10/25/2006 7:49:32 PM PDT by
Unicorn
(Too many wimps around.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-79 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson