[Rummenigge]

They would certainly keep their children form a publicaly and open disputed and discussed form of education.

Why would indoctrination be any easier in a public ond open form of school then in the cellars of some private entities ?

[Sisku Hanne]

Once again, you are missing the point. First of all, indoctrination can happen ANYWHERE. Indoctrination is the most likely in religious madrasses, where hardcore muslims already send their children. They usually do not home school because of the role women have in their society. Men teach the boys, and women are often denied an education. Therefore, any home schooling laws have a minimal effect on them.
Now for the sake of argument, there may be a handful of families who do homeschool, and whatever they teach within the walls of their home, as repugnant as I may personally find it, is their own business. FREEDOM FOR ALL is not a perfectly neat and tidy business, but it is something preferable to government indoctrination.

Conservative Americans believe people should have the freedom of choice. We also see PLENTY of socialist indoctrination in our public schools that goes against our moral and family values. Your argument that "because it is in public it cannot happen" falls flat. The schools set up governing bodies called school boards, and between the boards making decisions, the teachers unions wielding power, and individual teachers spreading propaganda in their classrooms, socialist indoctrination is a daily business. I was a public school teacher, and I saw it every single day. That is why 2 million or more American children are now home-schooled and the number is rising all the time.