Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Rembrandt_fan

Anyone who thinks that graphically describing with a view to titillate and MENTIONING are the same has an axe to grind.

There is a difference between, say, the Venus de Milo, and a blow up sex toy. Or between the play "Romeo and Juliet" and a porn movie showing teenagers fornicating.

If you don't see the difference, then nothing I can say will help.

And describing forbidden sex acts so that people know what's what is not the same as describing them in a salacious manner.


76 posted on 10/26/2006 8:08:02 PM PDT by little jeremiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies ]


To: little jeremiah
You wrote, "Anyone who thinks that graphically describing with a view to titillate and MENTIONING are the same has an axe to grind."

I know the difference. Back to the point of the thread: Fiction writers generally establish a scene by largely describing the actions of the characters rather than using explanatory narrative; i.e., 'It was a nasty, terrible place where immoral acts were the norm...' because most fiction writers know, from formal instruction and by the examples established by great writers, that the reader is more easily immersed in a fictional world when shown, not told. From what I gather, and having read the excerpt that Webb has written describing a particularly vile act (although I haven't read the whole novel), the aim of that particular passage isn't to titillate. I gleaned no salacious intent from the passage. It is graphic enough to make me cringe inwardly, but that--I suppose--is Webb's intent.

You might want to re-think your Venus de Milo example. What if the missing hands of the Venus de Milo were making an obscene gesture?

Finally, the only axe I have to grind is the general anti-art tenor of many of the comments I've encountered on this and other threads. Walking around perpetually offended by what one sees and hears and reads is no way to live a life--leave that to the intolerant types over at DU and MoveOn. Don't like it? Don't read it, or watch it, or hear it. Close the book, turn the channel, change the dial. Sure, there's plenty of tawdry, rotten, badly made stuff out there, but there's good stuff, too.
78 posted on 10/26/2006 9:17:25 PM PDT by Rembrandt_fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson