Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: OH2Am

ONLY if it keeps a liberal democrat out office


3 posted on 10/16/2006 11:45:54 AM PDT by clamper1797 (It is fatal to enter any war without the will to win)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: clamper1797

B I N G O ! ! !

LLS


4 posted on 10/16/2006 11:46:59 AM PDT by LibLieSlayer (Preserve America... kill terrorists... destroy dims!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: clamper1797

> ONLY if it keeps a liberal democrat out office

You've got it right. It bears repeating.


16 posted on 10/16/2006 12:23:27 PM PDT by jim_trent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: clamper1797
Yea, I've unfortunately voted for a number of candidates who did not deserve my vote simply because they were the far better of two bad choices.

I'll be doing it again shortly when I vote for Mike Dewine again despite how much I detest him.

23 posted on 10/16/2006 2:15:43 PM PDT by untrained skeptic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: clamper1797
ONLY if it keeps a liberal democrat out office

The problem with that theory is that it means that Democrats can guarantee the election of anti-gun congresscritters by running radical leftists.

When was the Lautenberg Abomination passed? What was the margin of passage? Why did it pass when it did, with the margin it did?

30 posted on 10/16/2006 3:14:20 PM PDT by supercat (Sony delenda est.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson