To: freedumb2003
"Billions of fossils, observed micro-evolution, thousands of scientists and millions of science hours be damned.
Rocks, evolutionists, and studying of this nonsense a theory does not make.
It's a lot of crap.
There is no evidence that man is a descendant of apes.
168 posted on
10/14/2006 8:11:23 PM PDT by
stultorum
(dont hire illegal aliens)
To: stultorum
Rocks, evolutionists, and studying of this nonsense a theory does not make. It's a lot of crap.
There is no evidence that man is a descendant of apes.
Unsupported conjecture ===> Placemarker <===
171 posted on
10/14/2006 8:14:44 PM PDT by
Coyoteman
(I love the sound of beta decay in the morning!)
To: stultorum
"There is no evidence that man is a descendant of apes." What kind of evidence would you accept for evolution and why?
184 posted on
10/14/2006 8:41:10 PM PDT by
b_sharp
(evolution is not, generally speaking, a global optimiser, but a general satisficer -J. Wilkins)
To: stultorum
It's a lot of crap. There is no evidence that man is a descendant of apes. Closing your eyes, putting your fingers in your ears and yelling "nya nya I can't hear you!" is no way to go through life, son.
225 posted on
10/15/2006 10:04:28 AM PDT by
freedumb2003
(ID: bad science, bad theology and, above all, bad philology)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson