Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The U.N. Security Council votes unanimously to impose sanctions on North Korea
cnn ^ | Saturday October 14, 2006 6:31 PM

Posted on 10/14/2006 10:54:16 AM PDT by maquiladora

The U.N. Security Council votes unanimously to impose sanctions on North Korea to punish Pyongyang for its purported nuclear test.

(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: clintonfailed; northkorea; sanctions; un
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200201-214 next last
To: stripes1776

The last thing China wants is a nuclear North Korea for the simple reason that it will force Japan to vastly increase its military capability and perhaps even develop nuclear weapons of their own, threatening China's entire regional supremacy.


161 posted on 10/14/2006 1:26:37 PM PDT by maquiladora
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]

To: Arkinsaw
The resolution has no teeth, but it authorizes those who do have teeth to take measures on their own.

Yep.

162 posted on 10/14/2006 1:32:35 PM PDT by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Nathan Zachary; silentknight; Arkinsaw

I didn't mean the North Koreans would blow themselves up. The US has the green light to search ships going into North Korea, regardless of their country of origin, as I understand it. I would expect martyr candidates to be clamoring for the opportunity to set sail for NK with a boat load of fertilizer and diesel fuel in hopes of being boarded by seafaring infidels.


163 posted on 10/14/2006 1:34:50 PM PDT by Axhandle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: sono
Double-Secret Probation...

Yes, guffaws all around.

Anyway, Saddam was on double-secret probation. Then he found out a few countries actual take that thing seriously.

164 posted on 10/14/2006 1:37:24 PM PDT by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: All
President Bush's statement Saturday after the U.N. Security Council voted unanimously to punish North Korea for its claimed nuclear test:

"Today the United Nations Security Council passed a unanimous resolution, sending a clear message to the leader of North Korea regarding his weapons programs. This action by the United Nations, which was swift and tough, says that we are united in our determination to see to it that the Korea peninsula is nuclear weapons free.

I have said all along there is a better way forward for North Korea. There's a better way forward for the people of North Korea. If the leader of North Korea were to verifiably end his weapons programs, the United States and other nations would be willing to help the nation recover economically.

The message today, however, says to the leader of North Korea that the world is united in our opposition to his nuclear weapons plans.

Thank you."

165 posted on 10/14/2006 1:45:46 PM PDT by maquiladora
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: Bean Counter

Hiya Bean! Long time no see....


166 posted on 10/14/2006 1:54:31 PM PDT by Just Lori (Thank you, United States Air Force! Sixty years of awesome service!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: maquiladora

this is the League of Nations all over again. ewe've got little tin-horn dictators walking out of chambers and flipping the dumasses in there. WWIII is on the verge...

I don't think we are prepared to fight it out this time. We have so far lost less than 3000 soldiers and our psyche is about to break into a panty-twisting frenzy.


167 posted on 10/14/2006 1:56:21 PM PDT by Cinnamon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maquiladora
The last thing China wants is a nuclear North Korea for the simple reason that it will force Japan to vastly increase its military capability and perhaps even develop nuclear weapons of their own, threatening China's entire regional supremacy.

Not a bad idea, really.

168 posted on 10/14/2006 1:56:56 PM PDT by Just Lori (Thank you, United States Air Force! Sixty years of awesome service!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: Cinnamon
our psyche is about to break into a panty-twisting frenzy.

Not all of us. Not even half of us, though you'll never hear it (truth) from the leftist media.

169 posted on 10/14/2006 2:00:32 PM PDT by Just Lori (Thank you, United States Air Force! Sixty years of awesome service!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: maquiladora
The last thing China wants is a nuclear North Korea for the simple reason that it will force Japan to vastly increase its military capability and perhaps even develop nuclear weapons of their own, threatening China's entire regional supremacy.

Good point. Did the Chinese just now realize that? They could have prevented North Korea from developing a nuclear bomb, but for some reason, they didn't.

170 posted on 10/14/2006 2:25:58 PM PDT by stripes1776
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: stripes1776

Probably just due to a growing realisation that China has less and less to gain from siding with a dinosaur like North Korea in the face of tempting Western economies.


171 posted on 10/14/2006 2:32:51 PM PDT by maquiladora
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale

Countries can decide not to trade or interact with a given country which is their business. There is no obligation to do business with NK. And deciding to not do business with a country is not the same thing as an act of war. You are not saying that our actions have resulted in NK being able to say we have declared war on NK (which we haven't). Surely that's not your point.


172 posted on 10/14/2006 3:01:34 PM PDT by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Arkinsaw
I don't think so, the wording gives the US the diplomatic cover to order North Korean and Iranian ships to "pull over to the side of the road and open the trunk". I suspect we will now do so.

But doesn't it also say we can't use military force? If so, then how do we stop them?

173 posted on 10/14/2006 3:09:44 PM PDT by Cementjungle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: blam

He's fond of Western pleasures.......while his people eat tree bark soup.


174 posted on 10/14/2006 3:26:10 PM PDT by He Rides A White Horse (unite)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: EGPWS
He is the best Ambassador we have had since Jean Kirkpatrick!

Ditto! And she was the best ever.

175 posted on 10/14/2006 3:26:29 PM PDT by Graymatter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: plain talk

An analogy could be the DOS, denial of service, action on the internet. Interrupting trade is an act of war, just as DOS is a crime. Recall the Arab embargo of oil to the West was an act of war. Also, a Declaration of War is an act by Congress in this country, although other countries may have their own interpretation. In the case of N Kor, as far as they are concerned, whatever they say is a declaration of war is a declaration of war.


176 posted on 10/14/2006 4:14:09 PM PDT by RightWhale (Repeal the law of the excluded middle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
Recall the Arab embargo of oil to the West was an act of war.

Pre-World War II Japan considered suspension of scrap metal shipments to Japan an act of war; not a judgement, just information.

177 posted on 10/14/2006 4:21:25 PM PDT by He Rides A White Horse (unite)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]

To: All
Early morning in Korea now, it's going to be interesting to see the reaction as the day unfolds there.

As I said before, I would not be surprised if we see another nuclear test within the next 48 hours.

178 posted on 10/14/2006 4:29:55 PM PDT by maquiladora
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

Yup...and we all see where those resolutionss from Gulf War got us...


179 posted on 10/14/2006 4:31:55 PM PDT by GLH3IL (Truth: The remedy for liberalism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: He Rides A White Horse
Pre-World War II Japan considered suspension of scrap metal shipments to Japan an act of war

Actually, believe it or not, I think what happened was United States banned the shipment of oil to Japan because of their aggression in China. At the time, United States was one of the biggest supplier of oil.

Japan considered that an act of war and bombed Pearl Harbor to give themselves time to build up a defensive wall of islands surrounding Japan.

180 posted on 10/14/2006 4:33:37 PM PDT by John123 (Boy ... am I gonna miss the cutest little jihaddist in Washington!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200201-214 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson