Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Fitzcarraldo
Again, we just don't know - a small, but effective neutron weapon of low explosive output would be consistent with the seismic data. I would assume this were the case.

A neutron bomb is a very small hydrogen bomb that's highly optimized to produce a big neutron flux. Given that we have no evidence that the NKs have ever developed a hydrogen bomb at all, I think an NK neutron bomb is highly unlikely, unless they stole it or bought it.

Remember that the US didn't develop neutron bombs until the 1970's. It's a 4th or 5th generation device, not a trivial piece of technology at all.

The much more likely explanation for a 500 ton yield is either (a) a barely-fueled "proof-of-concept" fission bomb, with a possible full yield test later; or (b) a lousy design.

31 posted on 10/13/2006 10:38:03 PM PDT by Campion ("I am so tired of you, liberal church in America" -- Mother Angelica, 1993)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]


To: Campion
I think an NK neutron bomb is highly unlikely, unless they stole it or bought it.

Bingo

32 posted on 10/13/2006 10:39:38 PM PDT by Fitzcarraldo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson