Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

O. K. GOP, time to take the gloves off. What do you have to lose but control of the House of Representatives?
1 posted on 10/12/2006 6:14:30 AM PDT by no dems
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: no dems

Glad to know somebody picked up what I've been saying for 13 days!!! The Left wants Gay Boy Scout LEADERS!!!!!


2 posted on 10/12/2006 6:16:38 AM PDT by Suzy Quzy ("When Cabals Go Kabooms"....upcoming book on Mary McCarthy's Coup-Plotters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: no dems

The Foley Scandal is already over. We have moved on to Maddy "bubbles" Albright and the autographed basketball. And on to the Harry "Graft" Reid investigations. It is too bad cause I don't think a lot of gay people like the idea of forced outtings like the Demonrats propose.


3 posted on 10/12/2006 6:18:00 AM PDT by YdontUleaveLibs (Reason is out to lunch. How may I help you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: no dems
If they take the gloves off, they lose the respect of the Washington Post.

They might be off the A-list cocktail party circuit.

Our pundits might not be invited back to This Week with Clinton's (Steffy) and Moynihan's (Russert) Ex Press Aides.

We are risking a lot by taking the gloves off. For some, it might be too much to bear.

4 posted on 10/12/2006 6:18:28 AM PDT by GoBucks2002
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: no dems

Dimocrats drool over Ruth, please feed me, Bader Ginsburg and she wrote legislation to change the age of consent to 12! Liberals are hypocrites and always will be.


5 posted on 10/12/2006 6:20:16 AM PDT by socialismisinsidious ( The socialist income tax system turns US citizens into beggars or quitters!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: no dems

Ms. Nancy's problems could be solved with a sex change operation ~ to one or the other ~


7 posted on 10/12/2006 6:21:15 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: no dems
Good point, but the 43% of the electorate that has trouble tying their shoes every morning will never make the connection on their own. Being a typical Dem voter means never having to engage one's brain.

The utter hypocrisy is lost on the "swing" voter as well. The constant drumbeat from the media propaganda machine daily pounds the message of GOP bad, Donkeys good. The "swing" voters only get their news from Katie Couric and CNN. Logic and political savvy for these people is seldom given a chance.

9 posted on 10/12/2006 6:26:12 AM PDT by Thommas (The snout of the camel is in the tent...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: no dems

It would be easy to destroy the Democrat claim that they would protect the children. The Democrat party constantly wants to sexualize children. From making sure kids have access to porn and to teaching them about 'safe' sex. If the Democrats were in power there response would be to lower the age of consent. It is a joke that the Dems are making this an issue.


10 posted on 10/12/2006 6:29:53 AM PDT by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: no dems
The longer the Foley mess hangs around, the more you hear names like Clinton (Intern Humper in Chief) and Kennedy (How's the water down there Mary-Joe) being brought up. This stuff will disappear very soon, because when it comes to morals the DimocRATS are lagging way too far behind and the issue hurts them more.

Don't think so? I often hear DimocRAT analyst say that 'Republicans paid a price for impeaching the Pervert-in-Chief' - That's a real laugher - because reality indicates that the complete opposite is true. The Republican congress that impeached Clinton is still in power, and hopefully after the November election - they'll continue to be in power.

Besides, the latest polling indicates that most people don't give a crap about Foley and it won't affect their vote one way or the other.

11 posted on 10/12/2006 6:31:06 AM PDT by jerod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: no dems

Since most Republicans dread the pointed finger mark, "You mean spirited conservative you", maybe they should avoid speaking negatively about a female in power (ala "Lazio violated my space" - Hillary), and just let Nancy define herself by airing the audio/video/transcripts.

Kill 'em with kindness and remain above the fray.


18 posted on 10/12/2006 6:39:45 AM PDT by constant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: no dems

Neil Nails Nancy? Ewwwwww....Now I gotta poke my minds eye out again.


21 posted on 10/12/2006 6:43:58 AM PDT by Mrs. Shawnlaw (No NAIS! And the USDA can bugger off, too!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: no dems

Here's one thing the Republicans could do. Say we share the shock and repugnance over Foley's behavior. Will the Democrats join us in a sense of the Congress proclamation urging local government to make illegal the acts Foley implied he wanted to do to the pages?


22 posted on 10/12/2006 6:44:45 AM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: no dems

It's Neal, not Neil.


38 posted on 10/12/2006 7:47:10 AM PDT by eyespysomething
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: no dems

You mentioned Chris Shays - I'm stunned by his statement. Maybe the dems have stabbed him in the back one too many times ..??

It's about time some of these TRUTHFUL statements were made about the dems.

Shays is right, Hastert didn't drive his car off a bridge and allow an intern to drown and then hold a press conference the next day. Hastert didn't kill anybody .. and I'm glad to see the President will be campaigning with him today.


39 posted on 10/12/2006 7:54:46 AM PDT by CyberAnt (Drive-By Media: Fake news, fake documents, fake polls)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: no dems

Swing batter, batter!
Swing btter, batter!
Swing batter, batter swing!

>Bo)


42 posted on 10/12/2006 10:04:31 AM PDT by NickatNite2003
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: no dems

just run an Ad that Pelosi endorses Foley to be a Boy Scout Leader. That' how she would protect kids.

Most parents will never see their sons go off to be congressional pages but they can easily see them becoming Boy Scouts and say Pelosi believes Foley is more than qualified to be a mentor and protector, as well as someone who can keep them warm in the chilly forest.

Boy Scouts here comes Foley, no pun intended.


43 posted on 10/12/2006 10:12:39 AM PDT by GivemeaBREAK!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson