Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

We should not allow breaches in moral code (sexual predators)
NY Times via Kansas City Star ^ | Oct. 11, 2006 | DAVID BROOKS

Posted on 10/11/2006 11:02:23 PM PDT by neverdem

This is a tale of two predators. The first is a congressman who befriended teenage pages. He sent them cajoling instant messages asking them to describe their sexual habits, so he could get his jollies.

The second is a secretary, who invited a 13-year-old girl from her neighborhood into her car and kissed her. Then she invited the girl up to her apartment, gave her some vodka, took off her underwear and gave her a satin teddy to wear.

Then she had sex with the girl, which was interrupted when the girl’s mother called. Then she made the girl masturbate in front of her and taught her some new techniques.

The first predator, of course, is Mark Foley, the Florida congressman. The second predator is a character in Eve Ensler’s play, “The Vagina Monologues.”

Foley is now universally reviled. But the Ensler play, which depicts the secretary’s affair with the 13-year-old as a glorious awakening, is revered. In the original version of the play, the underage girl declares, “I say, if it was a rape, it was a good rape, then, a rape that turned my (vagina) into a kind of heaven.”

When I saw Ensler perform the play several years ago in New York, everyone roared in approval. Ensler has since changed the girl’s age to 16 — the age of Foley’s pages — and audiences still embrace the play and that scene at colleges and in theaters around the world.

But why is one sexual predator despised and the other celebrated?

The first and obvious reason is that male predators are more disturbing than female predators. But the second and more important reason is that they exist in different moral universes.

Ensler’s audiences are reacting to the exuberant voice of the young girl, who narrates the scene.

(Excerpt) Read more at kansascity.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Editorial; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: District of Columbia; US: Florida; US: New York
KEYWORDS: foley; sexualpredators
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

1 posted on 10/11/2006 11:02:24 PM PDT by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: neverdem
The Foley scenario, if described in a play with the names changed, would be seen as a commentary on Gerry Studds, and would likewise be applauded. The second it was revealed he was a Republican, though, the audience would roar with laughter because a "conservative" is revealed to be a hypocrite.

It's all jokes to these people. Nothing matters anymore; the only morality is the morality of which side of the political fence you're on. Some "sinful behavior" is approved because it is empowering in its degradation, while the same behavior by someone who is perceived rightly or wrongly as having the wrong amount in the bank or the wrong opinion on abortion is seen as the ONLY reason for capital punishment.

Moral judgments are put on hold these days until the political positions of the players are known; THEN "being judgmental" is just fine.

2 posted on 10/11/2006 11:13:08 PM PDT by Darkwolf377 (Republican, atheist, pro-life)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377

If ye itch, should ye not scratch?


3 posted on 10/11/2006 11:44:45 PM PDT by Octar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377

Exactly!


4 posted on 10/11/2006 11:48:01 PM PDT by bondserv (God governs our universe and has seen fit to offer us a pardon. †)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377

I've seen this kind of comment on FR too often in these past few days. There are two things wrong with it.

The first is that we are more than 20 years removed from the Gerry Studds incident, and I doubt ANY politician would get away with something like that now. Look at what happened to Bubba 10 years later. He tried to cover up something far less vile than what Studds did, and the end of his presidency was a complete ruin. Now it's even ten years later, and no matter how you slice it, Foley is a hideous creep who shames the Republican party and the House of Representatives. The public won't tolerate that any more. McGreevey in NJ is a perfect example. He's a rat, and not only did he have to resign, but a senator who should be safe in his blue state is likely to lose as part of the fallout.

The other major problem is that for decades now, the Republicans have made a name for themselves as the party of family values, morals, and clean living. It's good for a few percentage points in every race, and everyone knows it. When someone is caught breaking that, though, watch out. Nobody has further to fall than someone who has reached the top.

Lastly... this guy is scum. Why try to justify or defend him? *If* you succeed in making people accept or ignore what he did, all you have really accomplished is lose those few percentage points. The only way to deal with this is to cast him out.

Look at the Democrats' tactics this election. They don't have a strategy or a platform. They just find individuals who have done something wrong, broken the Republican code somehow, and drag that individual down. It has happened over and over... everyone in Ohio, DeLay, possibly Santorum and Burns, now Foley. Put forth candidates that can't be dragged down like that and they will win.

As for the Vagina Monologues, I have no idea. I've never seen it and I never plan to. My guess is it is received much better by the loony left than it is by moderates or conservatives. Your statement that it is viewed as "empowering" is probably true; the only problem is the people who think that can't tell the difference between degrading and empowering. 13 year olds having sex at all, let alone with an adult woman? You're empowered! Give me a break.


5 posted on 10/11/2006 11:52:28 PM PDT by Thalos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Thalos
I too have seen too many comments on FR lately that present the scandalous lives of Democrats as though it is justification for Foley's behavior. Some have even demanded proof Foley's admission of improper behavior be proved by naming the underage pages Foley targeted.

My thoughts go back to my childhood when some kid would be caught doing something wrong, and the kid would react by trying to shift attention to something another kid did days or weeks earlier. Only people of very weak character would stoop this low.
6 posted on 10/12/2006 12:47:42 AM PDT by backtothestreets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377

It what naturally follows when there "is no God" which is precisely what the Bible says will happen. Imagine that.


7 posted on 10/12/2006 12:51:47 AM PDT by Frwy (Eternity without Jesus is a hell-of-a long time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Frwy

It IS what....


8 posted on 10/12/2006 12:53:11 AM PDT by Frwy (Eternity without Jesus is a hell-of-a long time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Thalos
Why try to justify or defend him?

And I've seen THIS kind of comment on FR too often the past few weeks. What's wrong with it is I'm doing no such thing--why do you have the need to get on your moral high horse and accuse me of such?

I am talking exclusively about how this kind of situation is treated by the mainstream media. Why can't you see that? I expressed it simply enough. I defy you to cut and paste where I justified or defended Foley--go ahead.

You can't. Because I didn't.

Discussions of morality are complex. Reducing them as you have is pointless and in fact dangerous. I don't have to say "Foley is scum and I'm glad he quit, and he should be investigated for this" every...single...time to prove my moral bona fides to you, whoever you are. It's like op-ed columns that don't begin with "This is my opinion"--it's a given.

As for the Studds situation, he remained in office for years after he was exposed, so to speak, during the Reagan years--hardly a time of liberal excess. Clinton DID get away with it--what planet are you living on? Where was the resignation? Neither Studds nor Clinton resigned over actual sexual situations--Foley did (PROPERLY I repeat for those who refuse to get it) for TALKING about it.

Disagree with me all you want, but please--disagree with what I wrote, not about things I didn't write so you can show us how wonderful you are.

9 posted on 10/12/2006 1:20:42 AM PDT by Darkwolf377 (Republican, atheist, pro-life)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Thalos
Your statement that it is viewed as "empowering" is probably true; the only problem is the people who think that can't tell the difference between degrading and empowering. 13 year olds having sex at all, let alone with an adult woman? You're empowered! Give me a break.

Well, yeah--that was my point. So what's your problem with it?

10 posted on 10/12/2006 1:22:30 AM PDT by Darkwolf377 (Republican, atheist, pro-life)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Frwy

I dunno, I think it's more about what Mark Steyn wrote about--it's not just there is no God, it's that there is no ANYTHING, no coherent, cohesive moral framework AT ALL. It speaks to the secularist embrace of the void, that we live and then die and we're dead forever, so just do everything you want. As a non-believer myself, I can tell you one CAN live a moral, ethical life without belief in God (my beliefs are probably similar or even the same as many believers in terms of treatment of others). But you have to believe in something. I don't see any belief in the secularists I encounter other than "be nice to people" which is a childish reduction of a complex world.


11 posted on 10/12/2006 1:26:16 AM PDT by Darkwolf377 (Republican, atheist, pro-life)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: backtothestreets

I haven't seen anybody present the behavior of tawdry, creepy rats as justification for Foley's bad behavior.

The reason the behavior of Studds and others is presented is to demonstrate the hypocrisy of the left and the fact that their supposed outrage over the Foley matter is just phony political posturing. If they didn't care about a youth being taken advantage of for homosexual relations in the Studds' case, how do they honestly present a face of moral outrage over mere emails and IM exchanges today? They still, today, defend Clinton's activities in the oval office as "just sex", but mere emails and IMs have sullied these youths beyond repair? Right.


12 posted on 10/12/2006 1:32:55 AM PDT by Jezebelle (Our tax dollars are paying the ACLU to sue the Christ out of us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
embark on a journey of self-discovery

Does this journey involve STD's, abortion clinics, and the inability to maintain a long term relationship in marriage.

I've heard this play mentioned in the press, but had no idea it celebrated pedophile. And then we wonder why we have so many sexually related problems in our modern culture. Amazing how disconnected people can become from rational thought when they are trying to maintain their idolatry at the altar of deceit.

13 posted on 10/12/2006 2:03:26 AM PDT by HisKingdomWillAbolishSinDeath (Psalm 9:17 The wicked shall be turned into hell, and all the nations that forget God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
The MSM has radically changed since the 80s. Driven by quarterly profits and Rupert Murdoch they are relentless bloodhounds.

BTW this attitude permeates all of American society now, not just the MSM.

Change itself is accelerating. We are all on steroids taking any and all risks in pursuit of ever diminishing returns.


BUMP

14 posted on 10/12/2006 2:30:03 AM PDT by capitalist229 (Get Democrats out of our pockets and Republicans out of our bedrooms.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Frwy
It what naturally follows when there "is no God" which is precisely what the Bible says will happen. Imagine that.

God does hate masturbators. Does He not?

15 posted on 10/12/2006 2:40:02 AM PDT by Jeff Gordon (History convinces me that bad government results from too much government. - Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Jezebelle

I agree the Democrats have completely and purposely distorted the essence of the Foley scandal. They've presented it as a political misdeed when in fact it is about an adult, one adult, using a position of trust and power to involve a teenager for personal satisfaction. That shame is on Democrats for abandoning children in favor of political posturing.

When it comes to protecting children and women, there is no party, just right and wrong. Foley is gone and steps are being taken so others cannot repeat his foul deeds.


16 posted on 10/12/2006 3:28:19 AM PDT by backtothestreets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Thalos

BTT


17 posted on 10/12/2006 3:40:10 AM PDT by Einigkeit_Recht_Freiheit (War is Peace__Freedom is Slavery__Ignorance is Strength)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Frwy
It what naturally follows when there "is no God" which is precisely what the Bible says will happen. Imagine that.

Of course you realize that history littered with the names of God's who are no longer worship.

When you kill God, He is replaced by another. The God of Abraham, although quite long-lived may someday also be known only to students of history.

18 posted on 10/12/2006 3:41:48 AM PDT by Einigkeit_Recht_Freiheit (War is Peace__Freedom is Slavery__Ignorance is Strength)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: backtothestreets; Thalos; neverdem
There is a huge difference between

~~~~~~~~~~~~~

...I seem to recal a Biblical admonition to accusers concerning, "casting the first stone"...

19 posted on 10/12/2006 7:03:45 AM PDT by TXnMA ("Allah": Satan's current alias...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377
What's wrong with it is I'm doing no such thing--why do you have the need to get on your moral high horse and accuse me of such?

Alright, you did not try to defend him. What you did say was
moral judgments are put on hold these days until the political positions of the players are known; THEN "being judgmental" is just fine.
You also say
Foley did ... for TALKING about it.
To me, these are attempts to downplay his crimes and deflect the negative attention. The only way to succeed is to give up the moral high ground the Republicans have established.

I'm also saying that these days, even Democrats don't stand this kind of behavior. Give a job to your gay lover? Gone. The rest of the party doesn't receive the widespread negative attention Foley has brought on because they never established they were the party that doesn't do this kind of thing. Even so, the negative attention is part of the reason a liberal senator is losing in a liberal state.

Re: Vagina Monologues: Well, yeah--that was my point. So what's your problem with it?

No problem. I was agreeing with you :P

20 posted on 10/12/2006 7:28:27 AM PDT by Thalos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson