[Theo]

Name one? Will these suffice?

http://www.icr.org/research/index/researchp_as_platetectonicsl/

http://www.answersingenesis.org/tj/v10/i2/information.asp

http://www.icr.org/index.php?module=research&action=index&page=researchp_jb_largescaletectonics

http://www.icr.org/research/index/researchp_as_igneousbodies/

http://www.icr.org/research/index/researchp_lv_r05/

http://www.bryancore.org/bsg/opbsg/003.pdf

http://answersingenesis.org/tj/v13/i1/crater.asp

http://www.bryancore.org/bsg/opbsg/006.html

[highball]

Nice try, but articles from advocacy groups do not count. You don't trust PFLAG for unbiased research into homosexuality, do you? Or Greenpeace for information on ecology?

And as noted, AiG has already been caught in a lie that they refuse to correct, so linking to them specifically is highly suspect.

Real science requires peer review. Which of these articles has been submitted for such review?

[atlaw]

Within your links I found this particularly fascinating commentary on the environmental (and, I suppose, meteorological) effects of sin:

"First, fixity of species would be a poor design principle if God intended for the revelation to persist. God knew that sin would enter His creation, and He knew that the consequences of sin would bring drastic changes to the Creation. Thus, any organisms that were perfectly adapted to their environments and fixed in that adaptation could only die in the face of environmental changes brought on by sin. In order for God’s revelation in creation to persist, organisms must be adaptable to the inevitable environmental changes. Fixity of species would lead to catastrophic extinction and thus the elimination of the revelation in creation (apart from God intervening by re-creation, for which we find no biblical support)."

You wouldn't happen to have any citations to creationist research on the correlation between specific sins and specific environmental effects, would you?