Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

North Korea wants to talk(says they tested NEUTRON BOMB)
Herald Sun ^ | 10/10/06 | Gerard McManus and agencies

Posted on 10/10/2006 3:37:05 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster

North Korea wants to talk

Gerard McManus and agencies

October 10, 2006 12:00am

A NORTH Korean official said Pyongyang is willing to return to international arms talks and abandon its atomic program if the US takes "corresponding measures," reports suggest.

"The nuclear test is an expression of our intention to face the United States across the negotiating table," the unnamed official said, according to South Korea's Yonhap news agency.

"What we want is security of the (North), including guaranteeing our system."

Yonhap didn't say how or where it contacted the official, or why no name was given.

The official didn't elaborate on what the corresponding measures would be.

But one of them is believed to be a long-standing North Korean demand that Washington lift financial restrictions on the communist regime for its alleged counterfeiting and money laundering.

North Korea has cited the financial issue in boycotting nuclear talks with China, Japan, South Korea, Russia and the US The talks last convened in November.

The official also dismissed moves at the UN Security Council to sanction the communist nation over its reported nuclear test.

"We have lost enough. Sanctions can never be a solution," the official said.

"We still have a willingness to give up nuclear weapons and return to six-party talks as well. It's possible whenever the US takes corresponding measures."

Pyongyang declared yesterday that it had successfully tested a nuclear bomb.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.com.au ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: korea; nkorea; northkorea; nucleartest
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-97 next last
To: AmericaUnited

Donald Sensing puts out a scary thought - that it could be a suitcase nuke

http://instapundit.com/archives/033097.php

Captain Ed thinks that North Korea can't tolerate our interference with their counterfeiting and will launch a nuke -
http://www.captainsquartersblog.com/mt/archives/008252.php


21 posted on 10/10/2006 4:22:57 AM PDT by saveliberty (I'm a Bushbot and a Snowflake :-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: backhoe

Thanks, I should have scrolled to your post first.

Sorry


22 posted on 10/10/2006 4:23:30 AM PDT by saveliberty (I'm a Bushbot and a Snowflake :-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
Tiger is there any doubts being expressed in your region that this was a DUD?

I got a feeling we just witnessed a failure....just a hunch I have.

23 posted on 10/10/2006 4:23:45 AM PDT by Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Just mythoughts

You read my mind. Just this morning, I was thinking since Clintons offered North Korea and Iran the same deal ($1bn for nuclear reactors) and since they did not observe whether compliance was occurring or not, is it possible that they thought that North Korea and Iran should have nukes?

I started to think back on all of the cash from China to the DNC during the Clinton years, the missing defense secrets, the apparent framing of Wen Ho Lee.

Tinfoil hat* - yikes! It sounds too much as if there had been some sort of secret sale to China. After all, peacenicks didn't want nukes, but to "prevent" wars, every country should have them. Then (the theory would be) that no country would use them. If this is correct, and there's no way of knowing if it is, then they made a huge miscalculation about how wars would be conducted.

* Mine, not anyone else's. I just have to snap out of it.


24 posted on 10/10/2006 4:28:21 AM PDT by saveliberty (I'm a Bushbot and a Snowflake :-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Did China ever get their train back?


25 posted on 10/10/2006 4:29:35 AM PDT by Solamente (Let all the poisons that lurk in the mud hatch out...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog
Re #23

Reports I came across here are of the opinions that theoretically it could still be a successful detonation of low-yield nuke, but many feel that it is a fizzle.

Unless they find dramatic evidence to the contrary, the consensus would be that it is a fizzle.

26 posted on 10/10/2006 4:30:44 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Solamente
Re #25

Not that I know of.:)

27 posted on 10/10/2006 4:32:01 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck
We have radioastronomers looking at stuff billions of miles away, why wouldn't this show up on their instruments too.

No doubt due to the Earth being a sphere and not being flat. Radio Telescopes in the US are generally pointing away from North Korea. If this was a real nuke, we should have had confirmation by now from all the sensors we have pointed right at North Korea (not radio astronomer equipment, but DOD equipment specifically designed for picking up the trace radiation). If this was the real deal we would have a blockade starting now followed a few days later with a successful Japanese test. If it was a real test Kim would not have to demand bribes. They would be freely given to keep him from setting off another.

28 posted on 10/10/2006 4:37:36 AM PDT by justa-hairyape
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: AmericaUnited
What am I missing here?

A voice crying for Bush to invade North Korea instead of Iraq. He should have left Saddam in power and throttled that sadistic madman Kim. Oh! that darn Bush just blew it so bad when he let Kim get away with this.
29 posted on 10/10/2006 4:38:16 AM PDT by carumba (The secret of life is honesty and fair dealing. If you can fake that, you've got it made. Groucho)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: saveliberty
Well tin foil hat or not it sure appears that the Clintons made a pact with Boris Yeltsin either directly or through malignant neglect had the effect of arming all manner and sorts of nations with the great equalizer.

Could well be that China's pay off had to be huge advancement in their own incapableness, after all it was the Clintons theme the "economy stupid" and lo and behold look whose economy made out under Clintons.... Clintons.
30 posted on 10/10/2006 4:41:28 AM PDT by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Junior
It is just a much dirtier version of a standard nuclear weapon.

????

31 posted on 10/10/2006 4:45:38 AM PDT by ASA Vet (Everyone keep clam!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
"So they blew this one as well as their last long-range missile launch?"

But they have learned much through both of these failures - they will get better at it as the months/years go by.

32 posted on 10/10/2006 4:54:15 AM PDT by Psalm 73 ("Gentlemen, you can't fight in here - this is the War Room".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

With South Korea halting extorted aid, that leaves only China, and I can't imagine China sending another train, only to be confiscated.


33 posted on 10/10/2006 4:54:29 AM PDT by Solamente (Let all the poisons that lurk in the mud hatch out...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: carumba
A voice crying for Bush to invade North Korea instead of Iraq. He should have left Saddam in power and throttled that sadistic madman Kim. Oh! that darn Bush just blew it so bad when he let Kim get away with this.

A twofer. Another October surprise and a Misdirection Play to Force the US to Turn Away from Iran. Kinda impressive actually. Putin did say 'Do you think you are smarter then us ?'. Also illustrates that the Russians and Chinese have complete control of the Democrat Party. It should be dissolved due to Treason.

34 posted on 10/10/2006 4:55:50 AM PDT by justa-hairyape
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: backhoe
Be careful ~ we have some younger Freepers who simply don't realize the US had tactical battlefield nukes in the arsenal and that some of the older f*rtz who post here were actually in the chain of command concerning their care and use.

Sometimes the Cold War would set off a geiger counter.

35 posted on 10/10/2006 4:58:11 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: AmericaUnited

"a micro size nuke" As long as it wasn't a fizzle, the smaller the blast, the more sophisticated the engineering. Conventional wisdom was they could only build a heavy, inefficient bomb and therefore could not deliver it on the tip of their missiles. The smaller and more sophisticated the device, the more the delivery options open up. We rightly will not hear most of this discussed but I wouldn't be at all surprised that the NK has a lot of pointy-headed people saying ruh-roh.


36 posted on 10/10/2006 5:09:52 AM PDT by NonValueAdded (Treaty Fetishism: "[The] belief that a piece of paper will alter the behavior of thugs." R. Lowry.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

I remember hearing about those. Interesting weapons, but still wouldn't want to be near a small yield nuke when it goes off.


37 posted on 10/10/2006 5:16:29 AM PDT by redgolum ("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: saveliberty
I have to agree with the comment on that blog posting. Why would Kim set off such a small nuke ? He could have had that little thing go off above ground. Would have been much more impressive. Proof of concept of this type only proves that he can set off little 1/2 kiloton nukes. Kim was counterfeiting cargo ship amounts of US $100 dollar bills and was starving millions of his own people, for this ? Now the pressure is on Russia and China to come up with more accurate assessments of the explosive force.
38 posted on 10/10/2006 5:17:57 AM PDT by justa-hairyape
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: backhoe

Back in the nid-60s, I joined the Wisconsin Army National Guard as a mortarman. As the senior, training guy in the platoon, I was the Platoon Sergeant as a Spec-4 and had to take the MOS test. I did all of the studying for it, and to my surprise, that included the Davy Crockett! Interesting weapon, with the launcher mounted to the rear corner of a jeep.


39 posted on 10/10/2006 5:31:50 AM PDT by Redleg Duke (¡Salga de los Estados Unidos de América, invasor!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant
Ingenious. Your nuke test doesn't work, so tell them it was a neutron bomb.

My first thought too.
40 posted on 10/10/2006 6:05:25 AM PDT by George W. Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-97 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson