Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

* BREAKING * "Signs of nuclear test"

Posted on 10/08/2006 7:47:28 PM PDT by Lunatic Fringe

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,621-1,6401,641-1,6601,661-1,680 ... 1,701-1,719 next last
To: onyx

I STILL think that the train station explosion was an assassination attempt that failed. I wonder if China was responsible for that one....since Kim had just been on a train visit to China.


1,641 posted on 10/09/2006 4:45:20 AM PDT by Miss Marple (Lord, please look over Mozart Lover's and Jemian's sons and keep them strong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1640 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple

Interesting speculation. China could definitely manage to kill Kim. Someone must. And soon.


1,642 posted on 10/09/2006 4:47:38 AM PDT by onyx (We have two political parties: the American Party and the Anti-American Party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1641 | View Replies]

To: onyx

Might have been Gen. McInerney. I haven't been listening to Fox since last night, have they gone all wimpy on tough-talking, cleared-minded guests since then?

Col. Hunt was on last night and advocating "listening to NK and finding out what they want". Sort of made me sick, he's taken a turn IMO, since becoming Hitlery's military consultant.


1,643 posted on 10/09/2006 4:49:50 AM PDT by prairiebreeze (Motto of the Democrat party: If we can't rule America, we fully intend to ruin America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1617 | View Replies]

To: prairiebreeze

It is impossible to negotiate with liars and Kim is a liar. Talk will produce nothing favorable for us. I am sorry to hear that about Col. Hunt.

I too got sick of FNC last night until McInerney appeared.


1,644 posted on 10/09/2006 4:51:51 AM PDT by onyx (We have two political parties: the American Party and the Anti-American Party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1643 | View Replies]

To: SE Mom
The Russians are saying the nuke test was much greater than originally thought...

Ouch, if true. Would the Russians actually be telling the truth for once, or are they playing this for all it's worth in the publicity / stoke-the-hysteria realm?

??

1,645 posted on 10/09/2006 4:51:51 AM PDT by prairiebreeze (Motto of the Democrat party: If we can't rule America, we fully intend to ruin America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1624 | View Replies]

To: All

Note: The following text is a quote:
---

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1716166/posts


N. Korea: SK Intelligence, "Unusual movements at Pung-gye-ri"(another possible nuke test)
Yonhap News (via Naver.com) ^ | 10/09/06 | Kim Nam-kwon, Lee Seung-woo

Posted on 10/09/2006 5:00:56 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster

/begin my translation


S. Korean Intelligence, "Unusual movements at Pung-gye-ri, too"

[Yonhap News 2006-10-09 19:15]


Head of S. Korean Intelligence, "Additional nuclear tests are certainly possible"


(Seoul = Yonhap News) Kim Nam-kwon, Lee Seung-woo = S. Korean government is busy analyzing signs of unusual movements in the afternoon of Oct. 9 at Pung-gye-ri, Gilju County, a different place from Munsudan-ri, Hwadae County, N. Hamkyong Province, where today's nuclear test occurred.


Kim Seung-kyu, Head of S. Korean Intelligence, attended the full session of Intelligence Committee of National Assembly this afternoon. When someone asked, "Have you pinpointed the N. Korean nuclear test site?" he added this information, while giving his answer.


He said, "Starting at 3pm this afternoon, we spotted unusual movements at Pung-gye-ri, where we first thought the test would be conducted. They are movements of 30~40 personnels and vehicles. We are looking into it carefully," according to a member of the Committee.


Mr. Kim went on, "We try to figure out if they plan to do a series of tests as India and Pakistan did."


Another member of the Committee said that Mr. Kim reported, "There is ample possibility that N. Korea would conduct additional nuclear tests."


According to the member, S. Korean Intelligence estimates that the nuclear bomb which went off today is a subcritical bomb whose yield is less than 1 kt.


/end my translation


1,646 posted on 10/09/2006 5:04:56 AM PDT by Cindy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1614 | View Replies]

To: All

http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1159193402025&pagename=JPost/JPArticle/ShowFull

Oct. 9, 2006 13:03 | Updated Oct. 9, 2006 13:53
"'Israel has cause for concern over N. Korea's nuclear test'"
By SHANI ROSENFELDER AND JPOST.COM STAFF


ARTICLE SNIPPET: ""Israel should be very concerned by North Korea's nuclear test," Uzi Eilam, former head of Israel's Atomic Energy Commission (IAEC) told The Jerusalem Post on Monday.

According to Eilam, "The cause for concern is three-fold. First, as a world democracy, it should be concerned by the threat a North Korean nuclear capability poses to the entire world. Second, It is certainly possible that Pyongyang would share its nuclear know-how with Iran, in return for a sizeable financial reward. North Korea's nuclear program is far more advanced than Iran's. While Iran has only started to produce fissile material, North Korea has done so at least five years ago."

"Third, Syria, which is also under heavy international pressure, could look at the North Korean example and decide to actively push for its own nuclear capability, taking into account that it would be a great deterrent to alleviate the pressure and get the international community off its back," Eilam said."


1,647 posted on 10/09/2006 5:12:08 AM PDT by Cindy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1646 | View Replies]

To: onyx
He'd be happy to take out millions with him.

Well, he'd need an awful lot of these mini-nukes to do that. More than he can make.

Plus he'd need a delivery system.

And that system would need survivability after whatever SSBN is currently on station in the Sea of Okhotsk obliterated him, and his country.

Look, a 15 kT weapon delivered as an airburst over a 1945 Japanese city killed 85 000 people.

One of Kim's nuke minis (maybe he should call it the nuke nano and start making them for Apple), delivered as a ground burst, or more probably a sea-level harbor burst, wouldn't even do that.

To "destroy the US" or to "kill millions" would take literally hundreds of these primitive devices, and assumes that after the first two, there would still be a "North Korea" (or for that matter that there still would be a "Pakistan"), both highly unlikely contingencies.

1,648 posted on 10/09/2006 5:13:04 AM PDT by Jim Noble (Some moron brought a cougar to a party, and it went berserk.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1629 | View Replies]

To: eeevil conservative
Little Kim with enough tech to make a BIG bomb and not enough tech to make a Little bomb is a GOOD THING?

It's not a big bomb in yield. It's where we were 50 years ago. Even some of our tactical nukes can be "dialed in" to get that range of yield. Hopefully the NK weapon was big in PHYSICAL size, and they won't be able to get up on one of their rockets for a while, but the clock is at 5 minutes to midnight on this now folks.
1,649 posted on 10/09/2006 6:16:24 AM PDT by Kozak (Anti Shahada: " There is no God named Allah, and Muhammed is his False Prophet")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1631 | View Replies]

To: Pukin Dog
More than a year ago, I wrote that the efficient way to deal with NK was to bribe more than half of its generals with, say, $2 million each, to overthrow Glorious Leader II, and hand over the nuclear keys.

There would then be a bumpy, expensive, but successful reunification of Korea, along the lines and time frame of German reunification. There is still an outside chance that NK will fall without a shot being fired.

Congressman Billybob

Latest article: "Sex, Politics, and Hypocrisy"

Please see my most recent new statement on running for Congress, here.

1,650 posted on 10/09/2006 7:14:27 AM PDT by Congressman Billybob (Have a look-see. Please get involved.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1530 | View Replies]

To: eeevil conservative
The seismic reading was 4.2, same as the Russian submarine Kursk, which sank from a conventional weapons explosion, suggests what you ask.

A uranium bomb consists of fissionable U surrounded by a shaped charge of conventional explosives. The shaped charge is intended to drive the material into a critical mass, so it will explode. Based on the available information, there is a chance that NK didn't design its bomb correctly, and the nuclear material did NOT explode.

Congressman Billybob

Latest article: "Sex, Politics, and Hypocrisy"

Please see my most recent new statement on running for Congress, here.

1,651 posted on 10/09/2006 7:25:51 AM PDT by Congressman Billybob (Have a look-see. Please get involved.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1618 | View Replies]

To: piasa

Thanks much for the info.


1,652 posted on 10/09/2006 8:10:18 AM PDT by mass55th (Courage is being scared to death - but saddling up anyway~~John Wayne)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1585 | View Replies]

To: Zuben Elgenubi

My friend's husband headed for South Korea on business yesterday, and she will be joining him tomorrow. I don't suppose they're in too much danger at this point??


1,653 posted on 10/09/2006 8:15:14 AM PDT by GOP_Thug_Mom (libera nos a malo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla

Ping to
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1711848/posts?page=592#592


1,654 posted on 10/09/2006 8:17:15 AM PDT by Godzilla (No God, No Peace - Know God, Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1609 | View Replies]

To: Pukin Dog
"Considering the polls, Chaffee might use this NK thing to pull a switcheroo and support Bolten, hoping for some GOP votes. In fact, I predict it."

I'm hoping the same thing. Voinovich changed his vote because of the type of message opposing Bolton would send to the terrorists. I think they need to put NK and Iran in the mix as well. Frankly, Voinovich should have taken that into consideration when he withheld his support from Bolton the first time around.

1,655 posted on 10/09/2006 8:18:40 AM PDT by mass55th (Courage is being scared to death - but saddling up anyway~~John Wayne)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1516 | View Replies]

To: onyx
I have heard FNC liken its strength to an explosion of 460 megatons(?) of TNT and that it was a nuclear test.

They have the size of test wrong, it initially appears to have been in the 500 ton range, not megaton.

1,656 posted on 10/09/2006 8:19:04 AM PDT by Godzilla (No God, No Peace - Know God, Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1621 | View Replies]

To: Lunatic Fringe

Last night CNN International was blaming Bush for the nuclear test by North Korea.

I don't think Al Jezerrrra or any Arab TV program could have done a better job than CNN did shaping the anti Bush talking points.

Madam Albright and her minions were all over CNN International denouncing Bush's failed policies in dealing with poor little harmless Kim Jong ll.


1,657 posted on 10/09/2006 8:20:10 AM PDT by OKIEDOC (Kalifornia now a certified socialist state reporting to Mexico City for further instructions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: OKIEDOC

I already heard a demoncrat strategist on Fox this morning blaming President Bush, so their talking points are well under way...too bad this is all Clintoon's fault in the first place.


1,658 posted on 10/09/2006 8:24:10 AM PDT by LegalEagle61
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1657 | View Replies]

To: Vortex

If we re-activate the draft and start bringing in people that do not really want to be there, whose heart really isn't in it, a possible side effect could be a decline in morale and fighting effectiveness of combat troops. Currently, all of our troops are committed volunteers that are motivated to fight for their country...they want to be in the military or they would not be there.


1,659 posted on 10/09/2006 8:28:06 AM PDT by GLH3IL (Truth: The remedy for liberalism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1477 | View Replies]

To: Godzilla


And now the Chinese are claiming an even higher number.


1,660 posted on 10/09/2006 8:47:55 AM PDT by onyx (We have two political parties: the American Party and the Anti-American Party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1656 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,621-1,6401,641-1,6601,661-1,680 ... 1,701-1,719 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson