Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Top 10 Scariest Cars
Cars.com ^ | October 8, 2006 | Tom and Ray Magliozzi

Posted on 10/08/2006 5:20:54 PM PDT by GretchenM

We asked Tom and Ray to give us their Top 10 scariest cars. They came through and were even kind enough to tell us for whom exactly the cars are scary.

1969 Ford Mustang

Scary for: Bystanders and other drivers

Looks like an early Ford Mustang, right? It is, on the outside anyway. The inside, however, is all Ford Falcon, a pedestrian vehicle if ever there was one. So what, you say? Well, drop a Boss V-8 into a Ford Falcon and what do you get? An overpowered car that doesn't have the shocks, brakes or structural rigidity to turn or stop well. In other words ... look out!

1969 Pontiac Trans Am

Scary for: Bystanders and other drivers

Garish? Sure, but that's not our complaint. This was the height of muscle-cardom. This was when American car manufacturers figured out how to make humongous, powerful engines. Sadly, they hadn't yet figured out how to do handling, so you had an overpowered rear-wheel-drive car with no weight in the rear end. As a result, when there was half a drop of rain on the ground this thing spun around like Dizzy Dan from the Battling Tops. Anything but perfect weather, and it was totally uncontrollable.

1971 Ford Pinto

Scary for: Firefighters and plastic surgeons

What could possibly be scarier than a car endorsed by both the Shriners' Burn Ward Fundraising Division and the League of Asbestos-Clothing Manufacturers? These cars had an unfortunate tendency to explode when hit from behind, since that's where the gas tank was located. Ford did eventually fix the problem, but the damage was done, so to speak. Being anywhere near a Pinto still gives us visions of Robert Duvall calling in airstrikes in "Apocalypse Now."

1973 Volkswagen Microbus

Scary for: Drivers

Here's a scary idea: Design a car so the occupants' legs are the very first line of defense in a frontal crash. Then add poor stability. Shaped like a pizza box standing on end, the Microbus blew around on the highway like Calista Flockhart in a wind tunnel. Drivers never had time to worry about these issues, though; they were too busy trying to keep themselves warm in the chilly Bus.

1974 Volkswagen Thing

Scary for: Onlookers

Just take a gander at this. No wonder they named it the Thing; it was styled by the same guy who invented the cookie sheet. Thankfully, they rusted quickly enough that few remain to invoke PTSD for former owners.

1980 Chevrolet Monza

Scary for: Mechanics

The Monza was designed as an economy car, so it was built to have a four-cylinder engine. Unfortunately, when sales slowed down, some geniuses at Chevy decided that what the Monza needed was a V-8, so they shoehorned one in there. The result? Half the spark plugs are almost impossible to reach; to get at them you need rappelling equipment and an air chisel. Whenever one of these beauties reared its ugly grille in front of the garage, every mechanic with more than six weeks' experience would go running for the men's room and lock the door.

1986 Suzuki Samurai

Scary for: Drivers

Rolling over is fine if you've got personal knowledge of Knuckles Goldberg's wrongdoings and you're heading into the witness protection program. Rolling over at 70 miles per hour on asphalt, when you're swerving to avoid an errant chipmunk? Not so good. These cars were cheap, so they were purchased mostly by young drivers — the people most likely to end up hanging from the seat belt with four wheels in the air. Scarier still, the Samurai wasn't that much worse than other SUVs of the era.

1987 Ford Festiva

Scary for: Drivers

Take a good look at this car. Kind of small, wouldn't you say? Now imagine yourself in a Festiva surrounded by amphetamine-snacking tractor-trailer drivers. Going 75 miles per hour. At night. In the rain. Scared yet? We sure are. We once got in trouble for saying this car came right from the factory with a funeral wreath on the grille.

2004 Hummer H1

Scary for: Society, the environment and therapists

When you stop to think about what kind of person would buy a Hummer, you begin to worry about the future of our country. This is a person who feels so inadequate inside that he has to drive around pretending the 82nd Airborne will be backing him up in his next argument over a parking space. On the environmental side, the Hummer burns through resources like there's no tomorrow. And if enough idiots keep driving them, there won't be.

2005 Pontiac Aztek

Scary for: Onlookers

Well, now we know where the designers of the Volkswagen Thing went to work after VW canned their sorry butts. Take a good look at this vehicle — it's a tribute to the art of unfortunate compromises. Someone at GM said "take a minivan, whack off a few corners and make something we can call a utility vehicle." The car itself was not bad — rather utilitarian, actually — but it pinned the needle on the visual pollution scale.

Posted on 10/2/06


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: cars; cartalk; scariestcars; tomandraymagliozzi
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280 ... 381-391 next last
To: Jet Jaguar

everyone knows that the smoke is what makes the parts work and when the smoke leaks out the part is no good any more. lucas came up with the brilliant service idea of replacing the smoke rather than the part.


241 posted on 10/08/2006 10:03:53 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard
I toyed with the idea of editing their PC comments but what the heck, it's their opinions, so I left it in.

Lots of people over the years have touted their radio program, "Car Talk," as being very fun to listen to as well as offering great advice. Even women friends of mine listen to it and love it.

242 posted on 10/08/2006 10:05:27 PM PDT by GretchenM (What does it profit a man to gain the whole world and lose his soul? Please meet my friend, Jesus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: GretchenM

marker


243 posted on 10/08/2006 10:09:33 PM PDT by knews_hound (Driving Liberals nuts since 1975 !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GretchenM
The article was so only necessary to start this thread, it served its only useful purpose.

TT
244 posted on 10/08/2006 10:10:15 PM PDT by TexasTransplant (NEMO ME IMPUNE LACESSET)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 242 | View Replies]

To: TWohlford
4. Oil shortages in '73 and '78. Detroit, then as now, makes a ton of money selling gas guzzlers that people really want. However, when the price of gas goes nuts, we all run to the small fuel-efficient stuff that people buy in places with permanant high fuel prices. Detroit built some great stuff in the late 1970's, but most people didn't want a V-8 RWD car (I had a few of those and they were bulletproof!).

Not only that, but they started putting 4-cylinder engines in their small chassis (which were already POS's) and even their mid-sized ones.

Of course, Detroit never figured out how to make a 4-cyl that wasn't a POS, especially when trying to power a midsize around. (I should add that Detroit's European subs understood 4-cyls a little better.)

245 posted on 10/08/2006 10:10:40 PM PDT by Erasmus (I invited Benoit Mandelbrot to the Shoreline Grill, but he never got there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: TexasTransplant

Yeah, that's what I thought, too. =)


246 posted on 10/08/2006 10:11:59 PM PDT by GretchenM (What does it profit a man to gain the whole world and lose his soul? Please meet my friend, Jesus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 244 | View Replies]

To: WestVirginiaRebel

I liked my Vega, it kept me from getting stale in diy auto mechanics.


247 posted on 10/08/2006 10:12:12 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: TWohlford

I had a '72 Gremlin with a modified 304; combined with the light weight it was very quick and left many surprised people behind it.


248 posted on 10/08/2006 10:14:17 PM PDT by Oliver Boliver Butt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: phil1750
...to attempt to get it to stop dieseling backwards when I shut it off. It would do this for up to 10 minutes at a time

Oh goodness, what an embarrassing problem! The chicks don't dig reverse dieseling.

When I hear stories like this, it makes me think that we're living in a golden age, car wise, at least as far as dependendability goes and in terms of just basic engineering competence. No car that you could go out and buy these days would have a crazy problem like dieseling in reverse for ten minutes.

249 posted on 10/08/2006 10:15:44 PM PDT by Yardstick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 212 | View Replies]

To: Chickensoup

I had an MG Midget at 16. I got lots of smiling officers' hand motions to slow down, NEVER got pulled over.


250 posted on 10/08/2006 10:15:54 PM PDT by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: GretchenM

I had one of those while in school. Trust me on this. The flowers are for the two gerbils in the rear compartment.

251 posted on 10/08/2006 10:17:07 PM PDT by Covenantor (Ghurka, Ghurka mohamed jihad, some things just beg for cold steel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 237 | View Replies]

To: Covenantor
Good one.
252 posted on 10/08/2006 10:19:08 PM PDT by GretchenM (What does it profit a man to gain the whole world and lose his soul? Please meet my friend, Jesus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 251 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom

I too learned to operate a vehicle in a '61' Beetle. My father "forced" me to learn to drive a stick shift - I understood why in later years.
My first time behind the wheel scared Dad more than it did me.

Also - a few years later, a girl I dated had a VW station wagon which had a cylinder head that loosened itself about every third day. I suppose my reason for being there was to crawl underneath with a wrench to cinch things back down until the next time.


253 posted on 10/08/2006 10:28:24 PM PDT by LFOD (IRAQ - Back in downtown Baghdad)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 220 | View Replies]

To: GretchenM
This will scare you!

Or this:

254 posted on 10/08/2006 10:34:08 PM PDT by cavador
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flatus I. Maximus

In the early 70's there was a VW Thing in the Seattle area with the vanity license plate "ROMMEL"!


255 posted on 10/08/2006 10:40:33 PM PDT by StevieB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 218 | View Replies]

To: GretchenM
My first "new" car was a 69 Mustang with the workhorse Ford 390 in it. I really loved that car, and it could move. However, the front/rear weight ratio was over 60/40, and the rear got squirrly once you got over 90.

My next car was a first-year TR7 -- California model! This is when I learned that you needed to own two cars if one of them was British made. (You needed the other car for guarenteed transportation!)

256 posted on 10/08/2006 10:52:48 PM PDT by StevieB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IncPen; BartMan1

ping


257 posted on 10/08/2006 10:53:44 PM PDT by Nailbiter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: cavador

You're right, it did. ewwwww Very bug-eyed car. How safe is THAT? ewww!


258 posted on 10/08/2006 11:04:29 PM PDT by GretchenM (What does it profit a man to gain the whole world and lose his soul? Please meet my friend, Jesus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 254 | View Replies]

To: Fresh Wind

I had same problem, I would park on hill so water drained back out thru heater vents


259 posted on 10/08/2006 11:17:49 PM PDT by Nailbiter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: GretchenM
RE: 1987 Ford Festiva

Take a good look at this car. Kind of small, wouldn't you say? Now imagine yourself in a Festiva surrounded by amphetamine-snacking tractor-trailer drivers. Going 75 miles per hour. At night. In the rain. Scared yet? We sure are. We once got in trouble for saying this car came right from the factory with a funeral wreath on the grille.

That's funny. Only because this can and did happen in the Los Angeles area. Which is why when I bought a car I insisted it had to be able to outrun tractor-trailers if needed. Found out Pontiac Fieros can go about 90 mph with no problem thanks to one tractor-trailer.

It's the 1984 model that had the infamous blow-up-due-to-lack-of-oil problem.

260 posted on 10/08/2006 11:29:48 PM PDT by Victoria_R (Still have it and it still can accelerate to escape tractor-trailers,,,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280 ... 381-391 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson