Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: bray
Interesting.

I just finished the segment that featured (among others) Laura Ingraham. I found nothing improper, right-bashing, or slighting in any of her comments. Quite to the contrary she expressed my opinion that the right shouldn't be distracted by this oh~so~obvious leftist ploy, but rather get back on message.

The closest to any criticism of Hastert that she made was that his response to this scam was that he bit, hook line & sinker. He allowed the Dhimmi's to control his response and force him into a defensive posture. By the time he recovered, his subsequent responses were just viewed as "cover".

What is inconsistent or inaccurate in any of this?
298 posted on 10/08/2006 8:32:56 AM PDT by rockrr (Never argue with a man who buys ammo in bulk...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 252 | View Replies ]


To: rockrr

you heard the same things I did nothing wrong there


316 posted on 10/08/2006 8:40:30 AM PDT by texicali (those than can do!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 298 | View Replies ]

To: rockrr
Thank you for your report on Laura Ingraham, which I won't see until this evening.

She has spent all week ticking her listeners off by insisting that Hastert resign. If she didn't say that on Fox, then she is backtracking from her statements of last week.

331 posted on 10/08/2006 8:45:57 AM PDT by Miss Marple (Lord, please look over Mozart Lover's and Jemian's sons and keep them strong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 298 | View Replies ]

To: rockrr

You haven't been listening to her show lately.


345 posted on 10/08/2006 8:51:53 AM PDT by AliVeritas (Gay democrats... you are about to go the way of blacks for illegals votes... your party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 298 | View Replies ]

To: rockrr

I just finished the segment that featured (among others) Laura Ingraham. I found nothing improper, right-bashing, or slighting in any of her comments.


I agree with you 100%. Today she was right on. And I am no longer a fan of hers. I stopped listening to her show 6 months ago.


362 posted on 10/08/2006 8:58:05 AM PDT by MartiniKing (Is it Happy Hour Yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 298 | View Replies ]

To: rockrr
Laura has reversed her every opinion. She spent last week bashing Hastert and all things republican on her radio show.

Her inbox must have melted down with fury.

She's a constant basher of all things in this administration and republican party.

She's sooo much smarter than all of us you know. More military experience, elected to more political offices, more knowledgeable on global issues too. Why she ought to be Secretary of State and Defense Secretary too.

377 posted on 10/08/2006 9:02:46 AM PDT by OldFriend (Should we wait for them to come and kill us again? President Karzai 9/26/06)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 298 | View Replies ]

To: rockrr
What is inconsistent or inaccurate in any of this?

The problem was what she was saying on her show all week.  "Hastert must have known."   "I can't believe that Hastert didn't know.  That just strains credulity."  "It's just not believable that they didn't do anything about this unless they were trying to protect the seat."

She got caught up in what the Drive By Media was selling and bought their version of "The Truth."  She had Hastert on her show Friday, was apparently quite respectful and appears to be back on the right path.  I think she's wrong in pushing the "let's just move on" idea.  That let's the dhimmicrat lies stand.  I think the story that must come out of this is the story of how George Soros funded organizations coordinated this, most likely with the DCCC and DNC, as a planned political sliming. 

The key factor for me is the threat by Mike Rogers and CREW to out more "gay Republican" office holders and staffers, starting Monday.  Rogers has been up front that he used information to blackmail a sitting US Senator, reportedly over the Alito vote.  The only "Republican" who voted against Alito is Lincoln Chaffee.  If that turns out to be true that is a major felony and a scandal to make Watergate look extremely minor.  Senior members of the Dhimmicrat party could do serious jail time if they had knowledge of that little "dirty trick."

448 posted on 10/08/2006 9:36:10 AM PDT by Phsstpok (Often wrong, but never in doubt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 298 | View Replies ]

To: rockrr

#298, you are listening to her now with the disadvantage of not having listened to her in the first week after this happened. Her hindsight seems to be 20-20 where her first few days proclamations about the entire matter were deaf,dumb,and blind. she needs to do better, she has been around a long time to be so tone deaf. Get it right Laura or get the Hell out of the way......


517 posted on 10/08/2006 10:31:20 AM PDT by samantha (Cheer up,the Adults are in charge,but need reinforcements very soon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 298 | View Replies ]

To: rockrr
... Just finished the segment that featured (among others) Laura Ingraham. I found nothing improper, right-bashing, or slighting in any of her comments. Quite to the contrary she expressed my opinion that the right shouldn't be distracted by this oh~so~obvious leftist ploy, but rather get back on message.

According to FR's Laura Ingraham threads for Thursday, Oct. 5, Laura made it loud and clear that she thought Hastert should RESIGN NOW. What she said on FNS today was sensible and right -- but it was most decidedly not what she has been saying on her show. She just weaseled out of it -- she didn't even have the guts to say, "Look, I've changed my mind." Instead, she was totally vague about her PRIOR stance just a few days ago. On FNS, she revealed herself as a chicken.

I was once a big fan of her show, but she lost me as a listener about a year ago, when it seemed like she badmouthed Republicans more than she badmouthed Democrats. I did then and continue to now regularly give her a chance and tune her in for ten mintutes or so, and sure enough ... give her ehough time, and she does the OPPOSITE of what she advised today on FNS -- she allows herself to become distracted and throws fellow Republicans under the bus instead of keeping the focus on dangerous and hypocritical Democrats. Plus -- and this is probably the thing I like least about her style -- what she thinks is wit and humor is really just derision and scorn. Zero class. True class -- Rush, W.E. Williams (*swoon*), Mark Steyn, Hugh Hewitt, Tony Snow, even Ann Coulter who falters often -- don't rely on derision and scorn to get yuks. Laura Ingraham, I am sad to say, looks more and more like a homecoming queen phony baloney.

With "Conservatives" like Laura Ingraham, who needs Liberals?

631 posted on 10/08/2006 1:35:02 PM PDT by Finny (God continue to Bless President G.W. Bush with wisdom, popularity, safety and success.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 298 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson