Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sunday Morning Talk Show Thread 8 October 2006
Various big media television networks ^ | 8 October 2006 | Various Self-Serving Politicians and Big Media Screaming Faces

Posted on 10/08/2006 5:15:10 AM PDT by Alas Babylon!

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 401-420421-440441-460 ... 921-935 next last
To: eeevil conservative

Oh yeah..... all innocent....


421 posted on 10/08/2006 9:17:10 AM PDT by Morgan in Denver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 419 | View Replies]

To: eeevil conservative

Watch it, he's mine.


P.S. I'm very, very proud of you... and many prayers.


P.P.S. Stay away from my man.


422 posted on 10/08/2006 9:18:29 AM PDT by AliVeritas (Gay democrats... you are about to go the way of blacks for illegals votes... your party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 417 | View Replies]

To: Morgan in Denver

LOL!

Honestly I am lost-

are you talking about the elections or the flirting with Johnnie?


423 posted on 10/08/2006 9:18:32 AM PDT by eeevil conservative (STEVE KING /JOHN BOLTON FOR '08...Ann picks King...I pick Bolton!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 421 | View Replies]

To: texicali

I've always liked Cronyn. Possible POTUS or VP candidate in 08?


424 posted on 10/08/2006 9:18:53 AM PDT by Seattle Conservative (God Bless and protect our troops and their CIC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 403 | View Replies]

To: AliVeritas

I have only seen the one posting about the stoning over a Ramadan offense. Speaking of real news, why in the world are we talking about Foley and not stuff like this:

China on Alert over Nuclear Neighbor:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1715844/posts

Warning, there is some graphic stuff in there so if you are squeamish, don't click through.


425 posted on 10/08/2006 9:19:21 AM PDT by Bahbah (Shalit, Goldwasser and Regev, we are praying for you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 414 | View Replies]

To: HawaiianGecko
I noticed how he would not deny knowing about all of this earlier and would only say he had not *seen* any of the exchanges.

I'm not surprised Rahm likes to wear tights.

426 posted on 10/08/2006 9:19:34 AM PDT by jennyjenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 348 | View Replies]

To: AliVeritas

LOL!

Thanks Ali....

much appreciated...

but alas- YOU are the QUEEN of really rolling up your sleeves and doing hard work for the "cause."

I just gab a lot...

;-)


427 posted on 10/08/2006 9:19:51 AM PDT by eeevil conservative (STEVE KING /JOHN BOLTON FOR '08...Ann picks King...I pick Bolton!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 422 | View Replies]

To: eeevil conservative

Did you see this cartoon? (My Dell needs an exorcism).
http://www.humanevents.com/rightangle/index.php?id=16874&title=privacy_concerns&tb=1&c=1


428 posted on 10/08/2006 9:19:52 AM PDT by AliVeritas (Gay democrats... you are about to go the way of blacks for illegals votes... your party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 419 | View Replies]

To: Alas Babylon!; Phsstpok

Thanks for all the work and information given by EVERYONE!!

It is only 6:12 and FoxNews won't be here until noon!! due to games. Listening to little Tommy.

We have a big problem all over the country with predators of our children. The first story is right HERE!!!!!!
Sorry I thought the following would be live links - but you get the point

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15163861/

KITV-TV ---- Honolulu, HI
Top Stories from: THEHAWAIICHANNEL.COM

Judge Sets $1M Bail For Coach Accused Of Sex Assault

Related Stories

• Police Arrest Coach Again Accused Of Sex Assault

• Suspect In 1998 Sexual Assault Arrested

• Suspect Accused Of Shooting At Police Arrested

• Man wanted for attempted sexual assault

• Police Investigate Elkridge Sexual Assault












429 posted on 10/08/2006 9:21:00 AM PDT by malia (President Bush - a man of honor!! clinton as President a man of horror)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: AliVeritas

WOW!

BULLSEYE!


430 posted on 10/08/2006 9:21:11 AM PDT by eeevil conservative (STEVE KING /JOHN BOLTON FOR '08...Ann picks King...I pick Bolton!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 428 | View Replies]

To: Seattle Conservative
"Rahm says the difference between Gerry Studds and Mark Foley is that his party didn't cover it up"

Studds actually had physical sex
Did Foley? Or was his crime only verbal sex??

I'm just curious, which is worse.

431 posted on 10/08/2006 9:21:21 AM PDT by ThreePuttinDude ()...Hey Libs........NO FITZMAS FOR YOU.....()
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 408 | View Replies]

To: eeevil conservative; AliVeritas

Flirting, of course.

(I just hope I have not screwed up and meant AliVeritas instead. It's so hard to remember that far back. Maybe rodguy will jog my memory?)


432 posted on 10/08/2006 9:22:03 AM PDT by Morgan in Denver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 423 | View Replies]

To: rodguy911

#241,it is going to be much tougher than she thinks because there is a lot of competition as witness EC's debut. The competition is getting better and better,and we only have two ears to listen,and 18 waking hours in a day.


433 posted on 10/08/2006 9:23:25 AM PDT by samantha (Cheer up,the Adults are in charge,but need reinforcements very soon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 241 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple

The rear end of an elephant? All right, little do they know that they are pumping up Republican voters "Big Time". They think that they are demoralizing us, they are doing the opposite. LOL


434 posted on 10/08/2006 9:23:33 AM PDT by BlueAngel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 368 | View Replies]

To: ThreePuttinDude

No matter which way they play it- they still hold the SHORT stick...

THEY (the LIBS) covered up- as well

it's a lose- lose for them anyway they play it if we look at facts...

but of course, the DBM doesn't care about no steeenking facts, let alone the LIBS.....

Facts get in the way of the Liberal montra and spin....


435 posted on 10/08/2006 9:23:47 AM PDT by eeevil conservative (STEVE KING /JOHN BOLTON FOR '08...Ann picks King...I pick Bolton!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 431 | View Replies]

To: Morgan in Denver

LOL!

I think we are both guilty as charged....

;-)


436 posted on 10/08/2006 9:24:23 AM PDT by eeevil conservative (STEVE KING /JOHN BOLTON FOR '08...Ann picks King...I pick Bolton!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 432 | View Replies]

To: syriacus

I'd love to take credit, but "la cage aux Foley" is the title given to this by the folks at the Journal Editorial Report, the Fox News Channel late Saturday night grown up news talk show with several members of the Wall Street Journal editorial board.

It's usually hosted by Paul Gigot, but Stewart Varney subbed last night. Appropriate since the main theme was about American demographics, including immigrants. It was a very pro LEGAL immigration discussion, and very positive. They effectively put forward the notion that within a generation virtually all immigrants are Americans first, hyphenated something else second.

http://www.opinionjournal.com/jer/


437 posted on 10/08/2006 9:24:25 AM PDT by Phsstpok (Often wrong, but never in doubt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 395 | View Replies]

To: Phsstpok

This is one of the best programs on TV, let alone FNC. I hate it though. It's making me stay up after nine to see it here.


438 posted on 10/08/2006 9:26:34 AM PDT by Morgan in Denver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 437 | View Replies]

To: Candor7

"Would ANYONE want a party of ANALY fixated Democrats in charge of national security?

This Foley fiasco is such a laugh.What about Massachusett's flaming page porker,Barney Frank, who hires girlymen to be his servants and chauffers?

I compliment the Pubbies for not even going there."


I read/heard somewhere is that the difference is that Pubbies wouldn't stoop to the sleazihess of outing Dim gays. The DBM and Dims can't seem to understand this and I think they are relishing in the thought that Pubbie gays are being outed (not all will say so publically though - got to make sure they get the votes from the Dim gays - don't want to anger them or be accused of gay bashing). They also think it's going to SHOCK all of the Pubbie Evangelicals and they won't vote for Pubbies because there may be gays in the party.

Lawrence (of the lie-lie-lie breakdown scene) is back out now):

MSM Silent As Lawrence O'Donnell Approves Outing Gay Republicans
NewsBusters ^ | October 7, 2006 | P.J. Gladnick

Posted on 10/08/2006 4:26:23 AM PDT by PJ-Comix

In times past, no public figure would want to be associated with dirty political tricks. Nowadays, however, Lawrence O'Donnell is enthusiastically flaunting the fact that the Democrats have stooped to the sleazy tactic of outing gays as a campaign tactic. The McLaughlin Group panelist and former producer of The West Wing has no qualms about his party engaging in sleaze as he pointed out in his October 5 Blog in The Huffington Post:

The LA Times has outed Kirk Fordham today. He will not be the last closeted gay Republican outed by this scandal.

So is this outing of Republican gays based on some important moral principle? Not according to O'Donnell. It is strictly a sleazy campaign tactic that is supposed to keep Evangelical Republicans from supporting their party at the polls this November as O'Donnell readily admits:

The Republican base--the Evangelical get-out-the-vote troops--are going to be devastated when they discover how many closeted gay Republicans were involved in policing Mark Foley in the House of Representatives.

As Peter Mulhern wrote in Real Clear Politics about the cynical Democrat tactic of trying to drive a wedge between Evangelicals and Republicans:

Democrats didn't keep Mark Foley's sins on ice and serve them up shortly before an election to make Dennis Hastert look negligent. They did it to drive a wedge between the GOP and its evangelical supporters by publicizing the fact that the Republican leadership in Congress gave the benefit of a substantial doubt to a known homosexual.

If O'Donnell were writing a West Wing episode in which one of the parties were engaging in outing gays for political advantage, you can bet he would make sure it would have been the EVIL Republicans who were doing the outing. However, in real life, O'Donnell is more than happy to enthusiastically support this dirty campaign tactic if it helps the Democrats at the polls. One can only imagine the media outrage if a prominent Republican had written approvingly about outing gay Democrats for political advantage. In the case of O'Donnell the only sounds coming from the MSM about this new Democrat tactic. other than the L.A. Times performing the outings for the benefit of the Democrats, are the chirping of crickets.

A sampling of responses to O'Donnell's promotion of dirty politics as a campaign strategy can be seen at the DUmmie FUnnies.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1715754/posts


439 posted on 10/08/2006 9:26:35 AM PDT by Seattle Conservative (God Bless and protect our troops and their CIC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 359 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory
come on Tim is not on "The List"

Of course not.  "The List" only has Republicans on it. 

440 posted on 10/08/2006 9:26:48 AM PDT by Phsstpok (Often wrong, but never in doubt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 292 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 401-420421-440441-460 ... 921-935 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson