Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SJackson
Liberals now believe there is a "gay" gene. Sexual preferences are inborn and according to them, its unfair to institutionalize discrimination against same sex individuals. Its a matter of putting them on the same footing as heterosexuals in the eyes of the law.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." -Manuel II Paleologus

48 posted on 10/05/2006 7:12:12 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: goldstategop
Its a matter of putting them on the same footing as heterosexuals in the eyes of the law.

Many of them don't want equal footing. Ask them if they'd be willing to give up any & all of their push for special status if they were allowed to marry. Since they are not physically able to procreate with their partner of choice, I can foresee a potential push for establishing affirmative action in adoptions down the road.

49 posted on 10/05/2006 7:20:14 PM PDT by GoLightly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

To: goldstategop
Its a matter of putting them on the same footing as heterosexuals in the eyes of the law.

That's the kicker.

Homosexual 'marriages' are against both natural and civil law.

In nature, a species must reproduce in order to remain viable. Homosexuals cannot.

In civil law, homosexual marriages cannot be sanctioned because civil law is based on common law. Common law is rooted in Biblical law. You cannot join two people in Holy Matrimony if that union is an abomination to God.

---------

Blackstone's Commentaries on the Laws of England, Vol. 1, 1735.

Upon these two foundations, the law of nature and the law of revelation, depend all human laws; that is to say, no human laws should be suffered to contradict these. There are, it is true a great number of indifferent points, in which both the divine law and the natural leave a man at his own liberty; but which are found necessary for the benefit of society to be restrained within certain limits.

54 posted on 10/05/2006 7:37:20 PM PDT by MamaTexan (~If we won't trust a teacher with a gun, why are we trusting them with our children?~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson