Posted on 10/05/2006 11:50:13 AM PDT by kcvl
Edited on 10/05/2006 1:00:50 PM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]
LOL!
Proving yet again how selfish these little jerks are....they didn't have any fears about taking part in destroying someone elses career. They only fear getting caught.
Chalk up another one in the "Thanks yet again, for your 'leadership' Bill Clinton" column!
Ok something stinks about this Vivyan story, first off how did Foley find this guys SN if the guy never gave it to Foley? Back then it would have even been harder to do I would imagine, I mean this Vivyan guy only worked in the cloatroom and never actually met Foley. So how did Foley find soo much out about this guy and get his email/sn? Did anyone who had an AOL email automatically have instant message back then?
You betcha. Timmy McVeigh's. I hope he ends up with a similar fate. Sorry, but you dont screw with a man's life or a national congressional campaign without severe repercussions. Enough is enough. These people really need to do some hard time- I mean these sick Democratic "pranksters" (from the tire slashers to the document forgery creeps.)
For Dems, "child" is a very fluid concept! Surely you've seen references to 14-year-old "women" whose right to an abortion should not be infringed. And the wailing about "children" killed by guns -- when a huge proportion of them are teen-aged drug dealers and gang members.
I can;t get over his quote that he said "Chip Englander, 25, is one of the best" and then couldn't name ONE of his campaigns!!! Istook needs to be told he is being taken for a SUCKER!!!
WHO OWNS the StopThePredators.com site? CREW??
What were they supposed to do...burn him at the stake? He was ELECTED.
Exactly! The logical response to the Foley matter would be "How much of this going on?", not veering off to go after Hastert.
I think the Vivyan story is BUNK.
From the looks of Istook at the press conference, I would say he knows he has been had. He has not gotten any traction since starting his run for Governor a year ago which makes me wonder.
Wilson is a dirty trickster and has been in every campaign he has been involved with. He is helping out Mitt Romney's campaign and also was doing Pence. He arranged for 'so-called endorsements in the primary for the Istook website. Some of them made no sense so I contacted the people and they had never endorsed Istook and Wilson/Englander wouldn't remove them from the site even though they didn't endorse them. He had Pence from IN endorse in the primary and we find out that Wilson is working his campaign.
Wilson loves push polls and did them in the primary the day before the election against two of our women candidates running for the Congressional seat that Istook gave up.
Could this guy be the source of the "internal poll" that Fox news is flogging? The results of which have been given to them by an unidentified GOP source.......
I started using AOL in 1998 and had to download it as IM didn't come automatically with the AOL account -- it was an added feature you could download.
This guy is lying IMO!
For some reason I am getting deja vu of looking into how typewriters typed in the early 70s. rathergate all over again....
Very likely! He did a phoney poll here in the primary that one of the Istook staffers outed when she got mad at me for being on the phone after walking out her tirade against another Governor's candidate. Found out that Wilson's 'statewide' poll was phoney because they only polled in the 5th district in heavily Republican precincts to show Istook winning handily against Sullivan and the Dem Henry.
I was on the phone to the Sullivan campaign when she went off and I got her to admit that it was a phoney poll. Since then I have learned from other sources that Wilson is nothing by a dirty political campaign consultant. No one I know trusts him. He gives consultants a bad name and hopefully this will tank him too.
Me too! It is deja vu -- looks like the MSM and DemocRATs didn't learn from Rathergate.
Yep, that's a completely different set of IMs, than the ones I read. Since there are, apparently, 50 or so different sets, it's not surprising that you and I encountered different ones.
I don't know how many people were using AIM in 1998, but prior to October 1997 nobody was.
According to the Wikipedia article on ICQ (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Icq), ICQ was first released in November of 1996.
Somebody could have been using ICQ in 1997, but ICQ was the realm of geeks. AIM's following was more among the general population.
I mean how likely is it that Foley happends to find out info on a Page who has been out of the Page program for months and then happends to find the guys email, and the guy just happends to have AOL in 1997. Then to top it off, how likely would it be for Foley to use this new tech to lure young men? It all just STINKs.
No...I won't accept that.
Don't try to tell me that NOBODY of significance on The Hill knew about his homosexuality.
That's ludicrous on its face.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.