Skip to comments.
ABC ONLINE GLITCH LEADS TO IDENTITY OF FOLEY ACCUSER; FEATURED IM EXCHANGE WAS WITH 18 YEAR OLD
The Drudge Report ^
| 10-04-06
| Drudge
Posted on 10/04/2006 5:12:16 PM PDT by jrooney
A posting of an unredacted instant message sessions between Rep. Mark Foley and a former congressional page has apparently exposed the identity of the now 21 year-old accuser...
ABC RELEASED TRANSCRIPT OF ONE CHAT BETWEEN FOLEY AND A MAN WHO WAS 18 AT THE TIME OF THE INSTANT MESSAGE EXCHANGE.... NETWORK STATED THE MESSAGE WAS TO 'UNDER AGE' TEEN... DEVELOPING...
ABC ONLINE GLITCH LEADS TO IDENTITY OF FOLEY ACCUSER; FEATURED IM EXCHANGE WAS WITH 18 YEAR OLD
(Excerpt) Read more at drudgereport.com ...
TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 200601; 20061107; 4thestate5thcolumn; abcdisney; aravosis; barbaramikulski; biasmeanslayoffs; billburton; boycottdisney; brianrosssucks; burton; byebyedems; cuespookymusic; disneynews; distortion; drivebymedia; election; enemedia; fakebutaccurate; foley; foleygate; hitandrunjournalism; homosexualactivist; homosexualagenda; johnaravosis; liberalmedia; mediabias; mediajihad; mediawar; mikerogers; mikulski; mslm; msm; phoneylibscandal298; powerghraib; rogers; smearcampaign; targetlist; thailand; trysellingthetruth; waltsrotatingcorpse; yellowjournalism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 361-380, 381-400, 401-420 ... 1,401-1,409 next last
To: MOgirl
Mogirl,
No I am really not. I am just trying to get people to step back and look at the facts before accusing this victim of a pederast. Drudge tends to attack the victim in these cases, and I don't see the proof there to pile on with him.
381
posted on
10/04/2006 6:17:12 PM PDT
by
bnelson44
(Proud parent of a tanker! (Charlie Mike, son))
To: Ronbo4027
So who went to ABC with the story?
Was it Edmund himself?
I think it was this bogus website set up just a few months ago in order to dump these IM's on the "market" right before the election.
382
posted on
10/04/2006 6:17:26 PM PDT
by
msnimje
(Seriously, if it REALLY were a religion of PEACE, would they have to label it as such?)
To: TheRobb7
Ann Coulter kicking the Democrat girl's arse on Live TV right now (FOX). The Dem girl looks speechless. They lost tonight. This is soooooo funny!!!
383
posted on
10/04/2006 6:17:27 PM PDT
by
AmericanInTokyo
(..is an American allright, but is not in Japan, folks. Thanks for letting me keep the moniker.)
To: PGalt
Thanks.
Wait until you see the next one: "A Pukin call to arms"
Coming soon.
384
posted on
10/04/2006 6:17:28 PM PDT
by
Pukin Dog
(Being a Liberal is just a coping mechanism for low self esteem and/or bad parenting.)
To: GeorgiaDawg32
Hmmm? What happened? They aren't asleep are they? Maybe they are in denial? LOL!
To: bnelson44
How could an "internet age of consent by 18" but the actual age of consent by 16? That doesn't make any sense.
386
posted on
10/04/2006 6:17:36 PM PDT
by
marajade
(Yes, I'm a SW freak!)
To: TheRobb7
Hannity mentioned it on the show. Sean has told his audience of this breaking Drudge Report.
387
posted on
10/04/2006 6:17:38 PM PDT
by
elhombrelibre
(Civilization and democracy are under attack around the world, so Liberals attack Bush.)
To: LibLieSlayer
Alan Colmes is repeating that the kid was 16.
Why isn't Sean correcting him?
He just mentioned Drudge'story.......
388
posted on
10/04/2006 6:17:44 PM PDT
by
TheRobb7
(How many Democrats will YOU elect by staying home on Election Day????)
To: bnelson44
If you are going to accuse this boy, I want to see the proof.Accuse? (there I go using one of your question marks). You're getting your accusations from a "place with NO zip code".
389
posted on
10/04/2006 6:17:51 PM PDT
by
capt. norm
(Liberalism = cowardice disguised as tolerance.)
To: NinoFan
390
posted on
10/04/2006 6:17:56 PM PDT
by
wouldntbprudent
(If you can: Contribute more (babies) to the next generation of God-fearing American Patriots!)
To: bnelson44
Geez, you are annoying. The main actual SEX message was from AFTER he was 18. Yes, the friendship started before he turned 18 and it got a little heavy, but the main sexual conversation that was highlighted by ABC and reported to be with an underage boy actually took place once the "kid" was legal age according to the timestamps. I'm not the first one who has said this to you either.
391
posted on
10/04/2006 6:18:10 PM PDT
by
NinoFan
To: jrooney
The Dems got what they wanted, Foley stepped down.
392
posted on
10/04/2006 6:18:18 PM PDT
by
Dustbunny
(The BIBLE - Basic Instructions Before Leaving Earth)
To: plain talk
I agree. I'm sick of it too. While our media and Congress is distracted in this ridiculous blame game, we have murderous beasts out there still plotting our destruction. Foley has resigned. Bin Laden has not. That needs to be our mantra.
393
posted on
10/04/2006 6:18:22 PM PDT
by
MikeA
(Not voting out of anger in November is a vote for Nancy Pelosi as Speaker of the House)
To: wouldntbprudent
It seems to me, right off the top of my head, that when all this is sorted out it will be deduced that Foley was a homosexual trolling for future lovers.
Right now everyone's confused about when this guy was 18, when the IM's was sent, if there were other Pages that Foley also IM'd.
I'm betting here, using the good common sense God gave me and what keeps me one of the little people, that Foley was a shrewd operator. He likely knew about age limits but he did want to recruit future lovers. Thus those "red flag" emails and requests for birth dates.
If I'm right, Foley's big "crime" was using the congressional Page pool for lovers when they came of age. Surely Foley's not a stupid guy. The Dems want the silly American public to hear the words "Republican" and "homosexual", "underage" and "cybersex" emanating from all this media hysteria and well I don't know what the hell they want. Any fool, even us busy Americans out here in la-la land, can see this is a pre-election frenzy.
The Dems will never get us dummies to accept THEM as the party of chasteness and purity. Remember, THEY had Bill Clinton and just can't shake him off. Americans sure won't buy that every damn Republican with an "R" for a party affiliation should up and quit. The Dems, as always, have overplayed their hand.
Republicans need to handle this and so far they're doing a lousy job.
394
posted on
10/04/2006 6:18:29 PM PDT
by
Fishtalk
(http://patfish.blogspot.com)
To: jrooney; All
Does this mean the dems are now GAY BASHERS ?
395
posted on
10/04/2006 6:18:40 PM PDT
by
ATOMIC_PUNK
(In everyday life there is more than meets the eye to reach the depths of truth we must DRAGTHEWATERS)
To: ground_fog
RESIGN BRIAN ROSS-YOU FRAUD HOPE EVERYONE HERE IS EMAILING ABC & ROSS!!!!
396
posted on
10/04/2006 6:18:48 PM PDT
by
blondee123
(Politicians are like diapers, need to be changed often & for the same reason!)
To: cll
"Colmes is stumped...the demo chick is getting trashed..."
Could you post that again...please...I just can't read that enough! :-)
Comment #398 Removed by Moderator
To: GeorgiaDawg32
We will have the team from Monsters Inc. have at ya when you come back
399
posted on
10/04/2006 6:19:20 PM PDT
by
uptoolate
(Their 'innocent' civilian is their next suicide bomber)
To: wouldntbprudent
The ONLY IM that exists before 2/23 and the man's 18th birthday, dealt with banter and an offer to have the young man over for a drink... when he came back through DC. The young man says he wouldn't be of legal drinking age until Feb 23. The salacious IM's are from April on.
LLS
400
posted on
10/04/2006 6:19:25 PM PDT
by
LibLieSlayer
(Preserve America... kill terrorists... destroy dims!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 361-380, 381-400, 401-420 ... 1,401-1,409 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson