To: blogblogginaway
Yeah, something is beginning to smell about Foley's Follies, making 3-day old fish smell like roses in comparison.
The MKJ theory:
The DUmmies, Kosomites, and other radical left 'Rats and their fellow travelers had this information on Foley for a a long time, and they attempted to let it ooze into the news with this absurd blog gambit, which all leads to the 'Rat attempt at their own lil 'October Surprise'.
The most disgusting part of this business, beyond Foley's perversions, is how the above 'Rats (whoever they may be, and may they soon be revealed) thought it more important to save up this information to exploit politically at the most opportune time for them, leaving minors at risk in the meantime.
2 posted on
10/04/2006 3:00:37 PM PDT by
mkjessup
(The Shah doesn't look so bad now, eh? But nooo, Jimmah said the Ayatollah was a 'godly' man.)
To: mkjessup
What makes you believe that the RATS that were sitting on this will soon be revealed? If it turns out that RATS WERE sitting on this news, so they could time it out, or leak it, for their own political advantage in the coming election. I believe they would also have to resign any positions of leadership they now have.
To: mkjessup
Foley's a perv and Hastert knew it. Hastert must go. Who cares who told on who?
To: mkjessup
my off-the-cuff/WAG is Kirk Fordham....doing his pennance to his fellow homo's for once working for Mel Martinez....and maybe a book and movie deal
To: mkjessup
Consider too that absentee ballots across Florida were mailed out recently and are being received and voted. The time to strike was ripe for the 2006 election cycle before too many ballots were cast pre-story.
26 posted on
10/04/2006 4:44:44 PM PDT by
NonValueAdded
(Treaty Fetishism: "[The] belief that a piece of paper will alter the behavior of thugs." R. Lowry.)
To: mkjessup
Right. The real scandal is who knew about the IMs and did nothing. People are going hysterical about this deal and we don't even know if Foley will charged with a crime. The only "crime" we know of so far is sending dirty IMs which is immoral and sleazy but are people prosecuted for that alone? The feds usually don't bust people for that unless they follow through and meet up with a federal agent posing as a child. There's no evidence I've heard of Foley having sex with a minor. But no one is focusing on what is the real crime that has been committed. I doubt this would be a big deal if it were a dem.
To: mkjessup
One of the "kids" was 18 in February.. The IM text is from April...Legal adult.
50 posted on
10/04/2006 5:37:10 PM PDT by
TASMANIANRED
(The Internet is the samizdat of liberty..)
To: mkjessup
Maybe this 18 old man and former page was hitting on Foley
111 posted on
10/04/2006 8:35:35 PM PDT by
LauraleeBraswell
(Try reading the article before you post)
To: mkjessup; YaYa123
Yaya had an interesting theory yesterday, in which she thinks these boys weren't "victims" but rather were kids who thought Foley was creepy and egged him on to see what they could get him to say.
And following your theory, IM's which were saved and passed around for laughs could have fallen into democrat hands quite easily.
124 posted on
10/05/2006 4:33:39 AM PDT by
Miss Marple
(Lord, please look over Mozart Lover's and Jemian's sons and keep them strong.)
To: mkjessup
I predicted this early on, this is going to blow up in the face of these Dummyrats.
Not every American is a stupid hayseed as the Dummyrats think we are.
Have we forget that the Dummies think of the majority of us as "fly over country!"
136 posted on
10/05/2006 11:24:51 AM PDT by
paratrooper82
(82 Airborne 1/508th BN)
To: mkjessup
The most disgusting part of this business, beyond Foley's perversions, is how the above 'Rats (whoever they may be, and may they soon be revealed) thought it more important to save up this information to exploit politically at the most opportune time for them, leaving minors at risk in the meantime.Yes, it's the D's fault, not Foley's.
It's unbelievable how many on FR are defending this guy.
143 posted on
10/05/2006 6:37:04 PM PDT by
Penner
To: mkjessup; All
"leaving minors at risk"
Yes, I have been especially disgusted with this aspect. Whoever knew about any of this garbage from Foley .. thought it was more important to save the stuff to hit the repubs with during an election time than it was to make sure the young pages were safe.
I find this as much or more reprehensible than what Foley did.
However, my local talk radio guy, Roger Hedgecock, interviewed one of the parents of a current page, and he was very confident in what the repubs did and how they handled the issue .. and he considered the pages safe.
Also .. what's not being said is that the contacts with one Page happened AFTER HE LEFT THE PAGE PROGRAM.
145 posted on
10/05/2006 9:32:41 PM PDT by
CyberAnt
(Drive-By Media: Fake news, fake documents, fake polls)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson