The Dems who love these alleged PRIVATE IM logs seem to hate the Patriot Act. Buuuttttttt, the Dems are ecstatic with joy over "tapping into" these private alleged IMS.
Whirrled peas........
Do words equal rape? Is cyber "sex" actual sex"?
The Dems who love these alleged PRIVATE IM logs seem to hate the Patriot Act. Buuuttttttt, the Dems are ecstatic with joy over "tapping into" these private alleged IMS.
Yes, you're right.
And those of us who can see know that this isn't about Foley or even about the “children” the liberals suddenly start caring about. If they really cared about them they would've raised the alarm back in 2003 when they supposedly knew about the instant messages. And if they are going to accuse Hastert of conspiracy and lack of leadership, where was the Speaker of the House - Democrat Tip O'Neil - in1983 when Gerry Studds, a Democrat Congressman from Massachusetts, had sexual relations with a page? Why didn't Speaker O'Neil demonstrate leadership and asked Studds to resign?
In fact, doing my research, I found that the Democrats didn't do that, they just censured him, and Studds kept getting reelected with the blessings and support of the whole Democrat Party.
Why didn't the Democrat Party get rid of the page program at that time if they cared so much about the children, and why didn't the media create the same stink they are enjoying now? Studds wasn't just “accused” of inappropriate emails or IM's with pages, HE WAS FOUND HAVING SEX with a page.
But I digress, this isn't about any of the above, this is about taking control of the House and the Senate. This is about appointing more leftist judges to the Supreme Court. This is about ending the war in Iraq and appeasing terrorists. This is about impeaching GW. This is about -as Clinton and the Democrats have been doing lately- rewriting history and pointing fingers to Bush as the one who is to blame for 9-11.