Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: woofie
ABCNEWS now has obtained 52 [!] separate instant message exchanges, which former pages say were sent by Foley, to two different boys under age of 18...

The fact that ABC now has possession of 52 separate IM's from Foley to pages tells me that it was likely DEMOCRATIC operatives, in cooperation with these underage pages and ultimately ABC, who planned (and maybe even paid) for these pages to communicate with Foley for the express purpose of having internet sex talk.

How else to explain the relative ease with which ABC and the Democratic charlatans got these IM's.

What teen willingly gives up personal info to any authority figure that easily, especially when it would embarass the teen.

804 posted on 10/03/2006 5:04:33 PM PDT by Edit35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]


To: MojoWire

I agree with you. I've been wondering that all day. Teens don't typically save their chats, especially chats that would indicate what these would indicate about them. Also, who held onto these chats for 3 years? The teens saved them for 3 years and just NOW are releasing them? I don't think so. Also, if Foley's advances toward the teens were unwanted or unwelcome, why would they respond to the IM's and respond in they way they did? Don't get me wrong, Foley needed to be gone! But something just isn't right about this....


813 posted on 10/03/2006 5:13:13 PM PDT by tsmith130
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 804 | View Replies ]

To: MojoWire
What teen willingly gives up personal info to any authority figure that easily, especially when it would embarass the teen.

A teen who is now an adult and judging from the contents of the IMs, not someone who is particularly shamed at his own behavior.

815 posted on 10/03/2006 5:14:06 PM PDT by jess35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 804 | View Replies ]

To: MojoWire
The fact that ABC now has possession of 52 separate IM's from Foley to pages tells me that it was likely DEMOCRATIC operatives, in cooperation with these underage pages and ultimately ABC, who planned (and maybe even paid) for these pages to communicate with Foley for the express purpose of having internet sex talk. How else to explain the relative ease with which ABC and the Democratic charlatans got these IM's.

SAid it before & will say it again, this is smells like the CBS/Rather mess!

Plus, these IM's are from when???????? 2003!!!

823 posted on 10/03/2006 5:38:51 PM PDT by blondee123 (Politicians are like diapers, need to be changed often & for the same reason!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 804 | View Replies ]

To: MojoWire
I think you are right. The problem is, the fact that we think maybe the rats knew this a long time and kept it as a political tool makes some here think we are somehow trying to cover for the pervert. NO way, but that doesn't stop us from exposing rat dirty tricks either!
828 posted on 10/03/2006 5:47:09 PM PDT by ladyinred
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 804 | View Replies ]

To: MojoWire

The emails are almost three years old. That's a long time to save IMs and to plan this whole thing. It sounds to me that whoever was on the other end of the Foley conversations was intentionally playing him along, maybe even went looking for him on-line just to do this. Actually, it's possible that the boys thought that it was funny, and saved the IMs for future reference. In that case though, I don't think that there was any damage done, except to the reputation of the fellow who didn't want any further investigation of the overly friendly emails.


851 posted on 10/03/2006 6:48:41 PM PDT by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 804 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson