[conservative in nyc]

No, it's not relevant in a political sense. It's just tit for tat... But it is relevant in a criminal sense. The person who sat on the IMs (for whatever reason) needs to answer for that since it put young boys in danger.

You simply just don't get it. It's not just tit for tat, especially if the hypocrite RATS knew about the IMs before the Republicans did. The Democrats shouldn't be getting away with feigning ignorance if they knew all along. You just don't sit back and let the opposing party make hypocritical charges if there is evidence to the contrary. That's stupid politics.

It's not really all that relevant in a criminal sense at all - not reporting a crime usually isn't a crime.

[carton253]

Yes I do get it...

The Democrats will get away with it because they can.

And we are working ourselves up into a lather thinking that we can prove to the American people the emperor has no clothes on we can what?

Prevent Ted Kennedy's relection?

Prevent Barney Frank's relection?

Prevent Hiliary Clinton's relection?

Circle the wagons and repeat as loud as you can "they do it too..." and the American people sigh and say "not that again."