Posted on 10/03/2006 2:05:29 PM PDT by areafiftyone
FOLEY BOMBSHELL COMING ... FORMER CONGRESSMAN'S ATTORNEY TO HOLD NEWS CONFERENCE IN WEST PALM BEACH, FLA.
"Yes, I believe Foley is making more and more friends among the Dims."
Thats because Foley is now playing by the democratic playbook.
Ewwwwww. I had to touch mu keyboard to type this. Mental visuals, ulk.
You asked who to get to play Foley....... It was a joke.
Did you save it?
ROFL!
Really?
I suggest you go and reread my post 'cause I was not talking about what Foley did. So, if you want to be outraged, go ahead and be outraged...but not at my post.
Did foley have sex with any of the pages? I have not heard that yet so to say he did what Bill Clinton did, and that was to have sex with an intern is not the same.
Innuendo, is that sex? Or was Billy Bob right, when he said he did not have sex with that woman.
Lets all realize that Foley is a very sick jerk, but Bill Clintoons was a threat to the country and still is.
Were the children physically in DC when this happened? Was Foley? If any of the parties involved were over state lines then he did break the law. Using the Internet across state lines to engage in sex with minors (which is declared as 18 in Federal law) is illegal.
Told one back... sorry, should have added a laugh track.
The leadership said they were only informed of ims and/or e-mails that requested pictures and seemed a little odd, at which time the parents asked that the contact stop. I am confident the parents were well aware of the graphic content and withheld it, only providing a basic overview, probably to protect their son because he was mutually graphic. How or why they have become public now is a mystery.
For the late comers, here's a summary of the festivities:
Foley is a homosexual predator, and has said so, except he denies having sex with underage boys. He also claims to have been molested by a "clergyman" at a young age.
And, there are few things as amusing as the Left attempting to act shocked over deviant sexual behavior.
Tune in tomorrow for the next October surprise.
I would much rather see that accomplished in the '08 GOP primary.
Agreed, but the circumstances also don't preclude some Rat dirty tricks along the way. Jes sayin'.
There are all kinds of little differences. But I've noticed the only difference that really seems to matter around here is the letter behind the name.
just checking back...
so was there a "bombshell" ???
I wasn't outraged at your post. I suggest you read mine again.
U.S. Code
TITLE 18
PART I
CHAPTER 110 —SEXUAL EXPLOITATION AND OTHER ABUSE OF CHILDREN
§ 2256. Definitions for chapter
For the purposes of this chapter, the term—
(1) “minor” means any person under the age of eighteen years;
No, see #672.
When I view the situation, I think they became public now because of politics...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.