Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: madison10
While this chapter may not apply in this instance, "children" and "minor" appear to be interchangeable terms:


U.S. Code
TITLE 18
PART I
CHAPTER 110 —SEXUAL EXPLOITATION AND OTHER ABUSE OF CHILDREN
§ 2256. Definitions for chapter

For the purposes of this chapter, the term—

(1) “minor” means any person under the age of eighteen years;

678 posted on 10/03/2006 3:51:36 PM PDT by michigander (The Constitution only guarantees the right to pursue happiness. You have to catch it yourself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 616 | View Replies ]


To: michigander

DC law defines a child as being under 16 and then discusses sexual activity with children. I think that was his point.


684 posted on 10/03/2006 3:54:21 PM PDT by NinoFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 678 | View Replies ]

To: michigander

I was looking for the definition of "child" in some of those the other day. There didn't seem to be one. The definition of who is a minor may be state law. For instance, it is 16 in Washington, D.C. I still think he is in deep trouble for the communications he did have.

What you have posted may be Federal Law. Foley was working with Federal Laws for Internet Child Abuse and Porn, I believe. Don't know which laws he was breaking, if any, just because I'm not super knowledgable on this.

This comes down to illegal vs. legal, not right and wrong.


692 posted on 10/03/2006 3:57:28 PM PDT by madison10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 678 | View Replies ]

To: michigander

In DC a 16 year old can consent.


722 posted on 10/03/2006 4:12:05 PM PDT by Perdogg (Democratic Party - The political wing of Al Qaeda)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 678 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson