What I and many others are angry about are the sunshine Republicans who are screaming for Hastert's resignation based on what they have read in the media, when it is well known that the Big Media is the Democrat party mouthpiece, and will parrot what they are fed. We want to know where the IMs have been for the last 3 1/2 years, who has known about them, and who DIDN'T inform the House leadership, or the POLICE, if they were so all fired concerned about the welfare of the pages in question.
It's been explained over and over to this poster who just refuses to "get it".
That's easy. Its politics and Hastert shouldn't resign. The most prominent organization calling for his ouster I thought was the Washington Times however.
At least he needs to have been found to be willfully negligent. My guess is no one on either side would have guessed the extent of Foley's wanton depravity. And if Hastert had come out and said "You're fire" a year ago to him could you imagine the uproar from the Gay lobby and the human rights dems?
No chance ... he couldn't say anything unless he had a smoking gun ... if they couldn't fire Clinton for doing the deed, they certainly can't fire Hastert for not knowing much about a deed he had nothing to do with. Of course if they find out he covered up - toast him.
"I haven't seen anyone trying to protect Mark Foley."
They might if people keep referring to him as "FFF". Just heard an intern on O'Rielly say that's what they called him. Actually spoke the word "fag" on TV.