Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

If a Nicaraguan canal were built, "it would bring an economic effervescence never seen before in Central America," Bolanos said.

The two proposed canal projects are not the only proposals in the works. According to the Times private investors are behind at least two other so-called dry-canal projects across Nicaragua and neighboring Honduras that would include new highway and rail links connecting expanded Pacific and Caribbean ports on either side of the isthmus.


1 posted on 10/01/2006 2:32:26 PM PDT by kellynla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: kellynla

Hmmmmm, Operation Plowshare?


2 posted on 10/01/2006 2:34:35 PM PDT by null and void (Barking at the staff & growling disapproval are OK... chasing cats during lunch makes you look bad..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kellynla
... and China is expected to provide financing for this project how???
3 posted on 10/01/2006 2:35:41 PM PDT by Ken522
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kellynla
A man a plan a canal Nicaragua.

Nope, doesn't work.

5 posted on 10/01/2006 2:36:53 PM PDT by avg_freeper (Gunga galunga. Gunga, gunga galunga)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kellynla

1. "Sabonge told the Times that there was insufficient ship traffic to support both a widened Panama Canal and a second canal in Nicaragua."

Yes, the sea-level in Nicaragua will be the only one used.


2. "project would be a joint public-private venture financed by unnamed investors..."

China... ?


6 posted on 10/01/2006 2:38:35 PM PDT by edwin hubble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kellynla

1. "Sabonge told the Times that there was insufficient ship traffic to support both a widened Panama Canal and a second canal in Nicaragua."

Yes, the sea-level in Nicaragua will be the only one used.


2. "the project would be a joint public-private venture financed by unnamed investors..."

China... ?


7 posted on 10/01/2006 2:39:04 PM PDT by edwin hubble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kellynla
Sabonge told the Times that there was insufficient ship traffic to support both a widened Panama Canal and a second canal in Nicaragua.

I'm all for honest competition. It sounds like the Panamanians think the Nicaraguans are stupid. People won't spend $20 billion on a losing proposition...

9 posted on 10/01/2006 2:54:03 PM PDT by John123 (Boy ... am I gonna miss the cutest little jihaddist in Washington!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kellynla

It seems to me that a second canal would be good for the U.S. and would add an element of security as well.

Shutting down two canals would be at least a little harder than shutting down one, if some enemy were inclined to do so.


11 posted on 10/01/2006 3:16:42 PM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kellynla

$200 billion is more realistic.


13 posted on 10/01/2006 3:36:01 PM PDT by razorback-bert (kooks for kinky)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kellynla

I suspect the Chicoms because they have the slave labour that would be required for such a task. This would be a three-fer for them...

1. Work five to ten million of their people to death thereby reducing their overpopulation of young men.

2. Would be able to achieve the construction without expensive heavy equipment.

3. Makes it more difficult for the US to shut down Atlantic-Pacific traffic.

Readjusting Tin Foil Hat.

NO2


16 posted on 10/01/2006 4:20:42 PM PDT by No2much3 (I did not ask for this user name, but I will keep it !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kellynla

They've been talking about this for 50 years. It was one of the excuses Jimmy Carter gave for giving the Panama Canal away. His argument was that it would be obsolete when the Nicaraguan canal was built.


17 posted on 10/01/2006 4:36:51 PM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kellynla

I doubt that anyone would risk $20 billion in a country that teeters on the brink of anarchy as does Nicaragua.


Well, maybe the Democrats would.


18 posted on 10/01/2006 4:39:39 PM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kellynla

27 posted on 10/01/2006 4:55:10 PM PDT by Jet Jaguar ("Being nice will get us killed")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kellynla

A Ugar, a cin, a canal: Nicaragua!

Sorry ... it just doesn't work.


31 posted on 10/01/2006 5:33:46 PM PDT by Redmen4ever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kellynla

I know that there are some former Big Dig Boston honchos looking for work...


33 posted on 10/01/2006 6:00:53 PM PDT by Scarchin (+)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kellynla
Having read "BOTH" threads,,,,I wonder why Oil Pipelines
and Railroads don't seem to have been given much consideration by China to haul OOGO's CITGO oil as well as
Container cargo from one side to the other! Both are faster and cheaper that this STUPID idea of digging another
canal ! China is a danger to the USA as well as OOGO the Fat. I do not shop at Walley-World or buy CITGO gas !
Jimmah Karter is an IDIOT ! ;0)
37 posted on 10/01/2006 6:50:27 PM PDT by 1COUNTER-MORTER-68 (THROWING ANOTHER BULLET-RIDDLED TV IN THE PILE OUT BACK~~~~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kellynla

Hmmm... I'll have to dig through my stuff. I once had a map of this canal as proposed way back then with hand drawn ink revisions and notes.


58 posted on 10/08/2006 7:09:22 AM PDT by bert (K.E. N.P. Foley is why we don't allow queers to be Scoutmasters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson