Please READ the entire article.....before jumping to conclusions.
The House leadership only saw the 'overly friendly' emails....it was investigated & Foley was told to stop all contact wiht the pages. nd the parents didn't want any public attention at the time.
The obscene IMs appeared more recently from another source that contacted ABC after they broke the story!
The House leadership only saw the 'overly friendly' emails....it was investigated & Foley was told to stop all contact with the pages. nd the parents didn't want any public attention at the time.
The obscene IMs appeared more recently from another source that contacted ABC after they broke the story!
Foley's behavior is despicable and must go!
However can you possible find any more unsympathetic "reporter" than brian ross, who always remind me of looking at a live RAT with his small RAT looking mouth?
In many ways his "reporting" is a copy of dan blather!!
===========================================================
Brian Ross of ABC News is the reporter behind the story that Rep. Dennis Hastert is being investigated by the Department Of Justice. Ross is sticking to his charges despite vehement denials from both the DOJ and Hastert himself.
Some may recall that Brian Ross has been involved in past journalistic controversies. Just last week, Mr. Ross reported he was tipped off by unnamed “senior federal officials” that his cell phone was tapped by NSA.
Last month, Ross was one of the first (if not the first) to report that Rush Limbaugh “had been arrested.” Reports which turned out to be greatly exaggerated, but which Ross never corrected.
In January, Brian Ross was the first to promulgate the claims of the self-proclaimed NSA whistleblower, Russell Tice. Ross treated Tice has a highly credible source even though Tice had been cashiered from the agency due to “psychological problems.”
Please READ the entire article.....before jumping to conclusions.
The House leadership only saw the 'overly friendly' emails....it was investigated & Foley was told to stop all contact wiht the pages.
I've read the article. I'm not jumping to anything.
How thorough could the "investigation" have been if it failed to reveal that pages were regularly told to watch out for Foley?